Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Ken's article on Pastner's recruiting misses for 2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 567551" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>AGAIN, you judge Ken's writing through a prism of someone that dedicates your free time to extracting as much GT sports information as possible. Ken's writing is never going to fully satisfy someone like you, me, and others on here...simply for the fact that we're all schmucks with the luxury of wasting our time searching out the minutia of every detail of everything GT sports related. That's not his audience. As you can see by some of the replies in this thread, I'm not the only one that feels that some on here are making a mountain out of a mole hill about Ken's signing day review...I'm just the idiot willing to go in the ring <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite44" alt=":banghead:" title="Bang Head :banghead:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":banghead:" />. Ken may not be the best beat writer to have graced GT media sessions, but I think he's done a good job of pumping out content for us, especially the content coming out for GT football recently. Not all of it will be to the standards that some hold him to, but it is what it is.</p><p></p><p>I'm not going to get into an Usher versus Watson debate, because it ends up belittling one or the other. What I will say is at the beginning of the this recruiting cycle, Watson was targeting as the local "must get" prospect we had the best shot at...hence the amount of time the staff spent on him. Heck, ALL of us spent a lot of time on him. That was not the case with Usher. There is nothing wrong with Ken reporting Watson as a miss. Whether we like it or not, GT missing on Watson is a fact.</p><p></p><p>From my point of view, it seems you have a personal axe to grind with Ken, and that's something you have to come to terms with. Some here are fine with Ken's work, others not so much...and that's the nature of all writers, not just Ken. </p><p></p><p>This is the last thing I'll say about this as we're arguing over preference now, and neither of us is going to change.</p><p></p><p>Haagen Das....<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 567551, member: 360"] AGAIN, you judge Ken's writing through a prism of someone that dedicates your free time to extracting as much GT sports information as possible. Ken's writing is never going to fully satisfy someone like you, me, and others on here...simply for the fact that we're all schmucks with the luxury of wasting our time searching out the minutia of every detail of everything GT sports related. That's not his audience. As you can see by some of the replies in this thread, I'm not the only one that feels that some on here are making a mountain out of a mole hill about Ken's signing day review...I'm just the idiot willing to go in the ring :banghead:. Ken may not be the best beat writer to have graced GT media sessions, but I think he's done a good job of pumping out content for us, especially the content coming out for GT football recently. Not all of it will be to the standards that some hold him to, but it is what it is. I'm not going to get into an Usher versus Watson debate, because it ends up belittling one or the other. What I will say is at the beginning of the this recruiting cycle, Watson was targeting as the local "must get" prospect we had the best shot at...hence the amount of time the staff spent on him. Heck, ALL of us spent a lot of time on him. That was not the case with Usher. There is nothing wrong with Ken reporting Watson as a miss. Whether we like it or not, GT missing on Watson is a fact. From my point of view, it seems you have a personal axe to grind with Ken, and that's something you have to come to terms with. Some here are fine with Ken's work, others not so much...and that's the nature of all writers, not just Ken. This is the last thing I'll say about this as we're arguing over preference now, and neither of us is going to change. Haagen Das....:) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Ken's article on Pastner's recruiting misses for 2019
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top