Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Jeff Sims
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="forensicbuzz" data-source="post: 837196" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Agreed, it seems harsh. But, I don't think he meant what you all are reading into that.</p><p></p><p>We've beaten Duke and UNC. In the UNC game Yates was struggling to move the ball. There's nothing to lead us to believe that was going to change that day. Duke required a heroic effort and some luck at the end of the game to win that one. We've lost every other game.</p><p></p><p>The discussion was about Yates and Sims. Can you honestly say that Yates would have led us to a win against UNC based on what we saw? Would he have made that throw at the end of the Duke game? Take away the turnovers, would that have changed the complexion of the other games? Probably not.</p><p></p><p>Tell me, what does Yates have in his repertoire that would have changed the outcome of any of our losses? Game management? I don't think that would have mattered with our defense. What can Yates do that Sims can't do that would have won any of the 6 games we've lost? In my mind, that was the question [USER=29]@Ibeeballin[/USER] was asking.</p><p></p><p>To me, he wasn't trashing our backup QB, he was saying that Yates didn't have anything that would have changed the outcomes of those games. I infered that he believes Sims gave us a more tangible chance to win. I agree with him. I think the only outcome of those games if Yates would have played instead of Sims is that we would have lost against UNC, might have lost against Duke, and the other games would have not been as close.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="forensicbuzz, post: 837196, member: 198"] Agreed, it seems harsh. But, I don't think he meant what you all are reading into that. We've beaten Duke and UNC. In the UNC game Yates was struggling to move the ball. There's nothing to lead us to believe that was going to change that day. Duke required a heroic effort and some luck at the end of the game to win that one. We've lost every other game. The discussion was about Yates and Sims. Can you honestly say that Yates would have led us to a win against UNC based on what we saw? Would he have made that throw at the end of the Duke game? Take away the turnovers, would that have changed the complexion of the other games? Probably not. Tell me, what does Yates have in his repertoire that would have changed the outcome of any of our losses? Game management? I don't think that would have mattered with our defense. What can Yates do that Sims can't do that would have won any of the 6 games we've lost? In my mind, that was the question [USER=29]@Ibeeballin[/USER] was asking. To me, he wasn't trashing our backup QB, he was saying that Yates didn't have anything that would have changed the outcomes of those games. I infered that he believes Sims gave us a more tangible chance to win. I agree with him. I think the only outcome of those games if Yates would have played instead of Sims is that we would have lost against UNC, might have lost against Duke, and the other games would have not been as close. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Jeff Sims
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top