Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
It's Officially Official! (Nate Woody Named DC)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Skeptic" data-source="post: 387833" data-attributes="member: 2175"><p>I'm pretty optimistic about this hire, though Johnson's endorsement was a typical if-I-gotta statement., Johnson still not a guy who enjoys the masses. I would have liked to see more of a commitment from both as to the type of defense, as "tenacious" is kinda what defense should be. I hope it is aggressive and active and we are done and rid of the read-and-react which too often really was played as wait-and-see. But maybe the entire board will give the guy until maybe the third game before screaming about those big plays allowed by being so aggressive. (I promise to scream only if we march 75 yards and score and the defense gives up a touchdown in two minutes. We have been there.) I think this guy will work, though I do kind of wonder why he plowed the lower 40 for so long. Good teams, good defenses, good football, but not FBS teams.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Skeptic, post: 387833, member: 2175"] I'm pretty optimistic about this hire, though Johnson's endorsement was a typical if-I-gotta statement., Johnson still not a guy who enjoys the masses. I would have liked to see more of a commitment from both as to the type of defense, as "tenacious" is kinda what defense should be. I hope it is aggressive and active and we are done and rid of the read-and-react which too often really was played as wait-and-see. But maybe the entire board will give the guy until maybe the third game before screaming about those big plays allowed by being so aggressive. (I promise to scream only if we march 75 yards and score and the defense gives up a touchdown in two minutes. We have been there.) I think this guy will work, though I do kind of wonder why he plowed the lower 40 for so long. Good teams, good defenses, good football, but not FBS teams. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
It's Officially Official! (Nate Woody Named DC)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top