Probably so.
But, my gut says that this is a surprisingly complicated answer, per the usual NCAA view on things. There's an outside chance that the answer is simple. But, given that simple answers often aren't accurate, the moving parts could potentially include:
* What year in h.s. is the student-athlete?
* Budd is not just the president. He was a football player in college.
* He is an employee of the Institute, and is therefore always technically a "booster" I believe.
* The student-athlete and family initiate the visit/contact, which could be a good thing despite all the above
* What do they talk about while together vs. what do they not talk about?
I'll brace myself for the onslaught of comments that ridicule any notion that this is complicated. But, I am an alumni board member at my college alma mater. We got an annual NCAA compliance lecture, complete with brochure, because simply by serving in that way we were now all considered "boosters" for athletic purposes. Innocent conversations/contact with student-athletes are perilously easy places to mess up.