Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hot seat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 26958" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>The irony in the person speaking those words. Pretty sure it's not lost on people who visit other boards as well a this one.</p><p> </p><p>Anyhow, back to the topic at hand. I'm glad you conceded that GT spends a lot on recruiting, and that was the gist of my original point. <strong>GT coaches have more than enough resources at their disposal to recruit better.</strong> Your link makes my case. Let me ask you this: Why do you think they feel the need to recruit nationwide now that their original plan of attacking Georgia hard as well as regions nearby hasn't worked out for them? It's not for lack of quality recruits who have the academic credentials. People only have to look at the two recruiting forums that the mods have created. PLENTY of guys who have the grades and have offers from us, and that's just in the Southeast. Yet why nationwide now? Is it because GT football has become a product no longer attractive to SAs? Look at the more recent interviews done with GT targets. Pretty much all of them cite our prestigious academics as one of the main reason why GT is even considered. So it's not that recruits don't appreciate what GT can offer them OFF the field. What does that leave? ON the field. Who's responsible for GT's on the field product? The coaches.</p><p> </p><p>It's really sad as GT fan that we're now being compared to the Service Academies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 26958, member: 360"] The irony in the person speaking those words. Pretty sure it's not lost on people who visit other boards as well a this one. Anyhow, back to the topic at hand. I'm glad you conceded that GT spends a lot on recruiting, and that was the gist of my original point. [B]GT coaches have more than enough resources at their disposal to recruit better.[/B] Your link makes my case. Let me ask you this: Why do you think they feel the need to recruit nationwide now that their original plan of attacking Georgia hard as well as regions nearby hasn't worked out for them? It's not for lack of quality recruits who have the academic credentials. People only have to look at the two recruiting forums that the mods have created. PLENTY of guys who have the grades and have offers from us, and that's just in the Southeast. Yet why nationwide now? Is it because GT football has become a product no longer attractive to SAs? Look at the more recent interviews done with GT targets. Pretty much all of them cite our prestigious academics as one of the main reason why GT is even considered. So it's not that recruits don't appreciate what GT can offer them OFF the field. What does that leave? ON the field. Who's responsible for GT's on the field product? The coaches. It's really sad as GT fan that we're now being compared to the Service Academies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hot seat
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top