Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
High school coaches impressed by Collins...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BCJacket" data-source="post: 519848" data-attributes="member: 2332"><p><a href="https://ope.ed.gov/athletics/#/customdata/search" target="_blank">https://ope.ed.gov/athletics/#/customdata/search</a></p><p></p><p>It's the data schools are required to submit to the DOE for Title IX compliance. Equity in Athletics. Select 'Conference' option and choose the P5 conferences, select the data: Football expenditures and the Year(s) you want.</p><p></p><p>My best guess on the discrepancy you're seeing is two things-</p><p>1. The DOE-EiA data lags by two years, ie the 'current' data is 2016. I'm pretty sure that our budget has gone up further the past two years under TStan, but it's not publicly available, yet. (That I have seen).</p><p>2. Other info- coaching salaries, spending on specific line items, etc is not required to be reported publicly. It's either available from FoI requests or not at all- Private schools and some state laws make that confidential. So, for example, USA Today has written some articles on CFB spending and either excluded or guessed on those schools. We may rank differently in specific areas.</p><p></p><p>Be interested to see links to contrary data you're finding on Google. Not sure what keywords you're searching for. The DOE data is by far the most comprehensive and authoritative data I've found. But I'm always open to more/better data sources.</p><p></p><p>(And Kudos for demanding access to primary sources instead of trusting what some dude on the internet [maybe] made up.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BCJacket, post: 519848, member: 2332"] [URL]https://ope.ed.gov/athletics/#/customdata/search[/URL] It's the data schools are required to submit to the DOE for Title IX compliance. Equity in Athletics. Select 'Conference' option and choose the P5 conferences, select the data: Football expenditures and the Year(s) you want. My best guess on the discrepancy you're seeing is two things- 1. The DOE-EiA data lags by two years, ie the 'current' data is 2016. I'm pretty sure that our budget has gone up further the past two years under TStan, but it's not publicly available, yet. (That I have seen). 2. Other info- coaching salaries, spending on specific line items, etc is not required to be reported publicly. It's either available from FoI requests or not at all- Private schools and some state laws make that confidential. So, for example, USA Today has written some articles on CFB spending and either excluded or guessed on those schools. We may rank differently in specific areas. Be interested to see links to contrary data you're finding on Google. Not sure what keywords you're searching for. The DOE data is by far the most comprehensive and authoritative data I've found. But I'm always open to more/better data sources. (And Kudos for demanding access to primary sources instead of trusting what some dude on the internet [maybe] made up.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
High school coaches impressed by Collins...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top