Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Here's a thought
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgtengineer" data-source="post: 885573" data-attributes="member: 3094"><p>Stansbury most definitley thought Ken would have been the guy thats all i heard from people who typically knew. I wasn't actually that fond of it myself only because I felt that for Wisenhunt to be successful he'd have needed a set of great recruiter young OC/DC and i had a decent fear we might have seen the return of Roof at DC. I am sure Monken was on the list as Monken is a bit of an innovator but we weren't going with a johnson disciple with those boosters so stansbury listened to the loudest voices who simply went for Collins based primarily on 2007's class and him being available.</p><p></p><p>I think the pushback against an air raid was mainly due to a lack of a 50+ attempts a game passer in the QB room. Though that was a bad misconception. There are many air raid variations. One could have worked for us.</p><p></p><p>I originally didn't mind the hire of collins, until he started talking. Then I guess you can say it rubbed me the wrong way and fears turned out to be right.</p><p></p><p>On Chadwell</p><p></p><p>Vandy is in the SEC east in most years a scheme will get you to 6 wins. Especially if they make sure to schedule vandy's ooc so they get 3 free wins. They should be able to pick up wins over Missou kentucky and SCAR relatively regularly with decent coaching. Franklin was able to recruit it and win. Chadwell could as well. Basically the Cutcliffe model for bowl games he did at duke. If he does well at vandy its an easy springboard to an even bigger payday (like it was for franklin).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgtengineer, post: 885573, member: 3094"] Stansbury most definitley thought Ken would have been the guy thats all i heard from people who typically knew. I wasn't actually that fond of it myself only because I felt that for Wisenhunt to be successful he'd have needed a set of great recruiter young OC/DC and i had a decent fear we might have seen the return of Roof at DC. I am sure Monken was on the list as Monken is a bit of an innovator but we weren't going with a johnson disciple with those boosters so stansbury listened to the loudest voices who simply went for Collins based primarily on 2007's class and him being available. I think the pushback against an air raid was mainly due to a lack of a 50+ attempts a game passer in the QB room. Though that was a bad misconception. There are many air raid variations. One could have worked for us. I originally didn't mind the hire of collins, until he started talking. Then I guess you can say it rubbed me the wrong way and fears turned out to be right. On Chadwell Vandy is in the SEC east in most years a scheme will get you to 6 wins. Especially if they make sure to schedule vandy's ooc so they get 3 free wins. They should be able to pick up wins over Missou kentucky and SCAR relatively regularly with decent coaching. Franklin was able to recruit it and win. Chadwell could as well. Basically the Cutcliffe model for bowl games he did at duke. If he does well at vandy its an easy springboard to an even bigger payday (like it was for franklin). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Here's a thought
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top