Article GT vs UCF Postgame Thread

  • Highlight

Shorthanded Jackets Fall Short In Home Opener

Jahmyr Gibbs (21) runs for a touchdown (Hyosub Shin / ajc.com)

Atlanta, GA – Down six starters and depth at key positions, the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (1-1, 1-0) faded late Saturday night in their first home tilt of the 2020 season.  The Central Florida Knights (1-0, 0-0), a respected top 25 program over the last few years, emerged victorious by a final score of 49-21.

The Jackets entered the game with gaps and question marks across its Above The Line (ATL) depth chart when compared to preseason expectations.  Absent from the offense today were starters RB Jordan Mason and TE Dylan Deveney.  Another TE, Dylan Leonard, was a scratch.

The damage done to the defense made matters worse.  Tech’s defensive line was missing starters DE Antonneous Clayton, DT TK Chimedza and DL Antwan Owens along with key rotational player DE Curtis Ryans, a key cog in the Jackets’ week 1 win against Florida State.  Tech’s top CB Tre Swilling also missed his second consecutive game.

“We had to get creative in practice this week… minimal 12 personnel on offense and three down linemen on defense,” said Head Coach Geoff Collins in his postgame interview with radioman Wiley Ballard.

Let’s be clear.  Neither Collins nor the players claimed moral victories.  Save those for today’s victor who is wont for fabricated titles and hardware.

For Tech the mantra is next man up.  The team fought valiantly, showing signs of life into the 4th quarter against an opponent that most outside of the Georgia Tech program expected to roll easily today.  A 33-yard touchdown run by true freshman RB Jahmyr Gibbs narrowed the Knights’ lead to 28-21 with 13:12 remaining in the game.  The home crowd was energized as was the home team.

But football games are won on the line of scrimmage, and Tech began with one hand tied behind its back on the defensive front.  Evidence of wear and tear to that unit showed itself late as the Knights’ vaunted offense reasserted itself in the 4th quarter, scoring three consecutive touchdowns immediately after Gibbs’ jaunt without much resistance.  Tech’s offense sputtered in response, and the final chapter of the story was written.

Despite the absence of key players, the Jackets had plenty of opportunities within their control to affect the outcome of the game.  Turnovers and special teams often determine college football games and today was no different.

Following an impressive first game despite a few mistakes, QB Jeff Sims led a Tech offense today that coughed up the ball five times.  Of the Jackets five turnovers, two came thru the air and three came via the ground game.

Special teams was a mixed bag.  Rarely is “mixed bag” a positive, however after the debacle in Tallahassee that descriptor is an improvement.  The Jackets must resolve its field goal issues to become a threat in the ACC this year and in the future.  See 2014.  Otherwise, “mixed bag” will lead to a new definition for “scoring range”.

There were certainly signs of light.  Jahmyr Gibbs lived up to his billing, ripping off a 75 yard kickoff return on his first collegiate touch.  Gibbs finished with 219 all purpose yards and two touchdowns. 

Tech’s offense has now shown a pattern of improvement as compared to last year.  Sims led the offense to 471 yards of total offense.  Nine different receivers caught balls for 244 yards thru the air, demonstrating a balance and proficiency without needing to rely on one or two playmakers.  To that end, noticeably absent despite the team success were WR Ahmarean Brown and WR Jalen Camp, each of which tallied a single reception for 11 yards.

The Jackets managed 12 chunk plays, defined as passing plays of 15+ yards and running plays of 10+ yards.  The distribution was an even 6 and 6, respectively.  Overall the offense produced 5.8 yards per play and converted 7 of 15 third downs.

Last but certainly not least, punter Pressley Harvin remained an “absolute unit”, averaging 51.2 yards per punt.  Of his four punts, three ended up inside the 20, with one boom ball traveling 70 yards.

Ultimately it was feast or famine on offense.  Combined with a shorthanded defense forced to play 92 plays, the flood gates opened late for Tech’s foe.  Next week brings Tech back into ACC play with a road trip to Syracuse and an opportunity to go 2-0 in ACC play.

 
Last edited:

Josh H

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
390
Was at the game. I'll say Tech did a great job with protocol, most people kept their masks on and were respectful, and it was nice to have a beer in Bobby Dodd.

UCF is a good team. The run their offense well. They got a *lot* of help from the refs. Off the top of my head, I can think of several no-call holds (one in the corner of the end zone), the 6 yard tackle for loss that somehow ended up with a 3 yard gain (and them snapping the ball immediately), a possible fumble where the first ruled the runner's knee was down and next that his elbow was down, and the worst was the blatant no-call where their defender literally hugged our receiver over the middle.

I'm still shocked the Jeff Sims end zone fumble was overturned by video review.

Outside of that - it's clear we weren't ready for their speed at times on defense. We need to be faster with our play calls to get our guys in a position to play.

Offense bogged down at times, but I think a lot was missing the two TEs. We started moving the ball in the 4th quarter when we went back to adding a TE and started running.
 

dmel25

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
478
I'll say this, you could have put any ACC team out there against UCF (except Clemson) and they would have lost with how bad the refs were.
 

Josh H

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
390
I usually don't gripe about refs, but they were bad. It was funny/sad when the announcer yelled (by mistake) "he pushed off!" and there was no flag on interference. Lots of no calls...

Comical. I forgot about that.

Felt like I was watching a Duke game.
 

JacketOff

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,951
The bad news?
  • Tech lost rather convincingly on national TV
The good news?
  • Tech had opportunities to take the lead, made tons of mistakes, and it was still a 1 score game in the 4th quarter. The final score isn’t totally representative of what the game was, but the better team won the game
  • Even with many starters out, play wasn’t awful on either side of the ball, but definitely not as crisp as last week. Much better than 2019. Can only go up from here.
  • Gibbs is going to be a star
  • Stewart might be the new kicker?
The best news?
  • Georgia Tech is tied for 1st in the ACC, and will have a good chance to hold that position after next week’s game.


 

85Escape

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,450
I think you are underestimating Syracuse and possibly overestimating Georgia Tech. We will have to play much better to beat Syracuse. They will be fighting for their lives next week.

Go Jackets!
Nah, we are just overestimating UCF since The Disney Channel talking heads told us they are really good and that they are the 'real national champs'. If that's true we looked pretty good. Unfortunately, that's not true and we aren't as far along as you'd hope yet.

But the future's looking good. Patience and whiskey. More the latter probably this year.
 

Madison Grant

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,276
I think you are underestimating Syracuse and possibly overestimating Georgia Tech. We will have to play much better to beat Syracuse. They will be fighting for their lives next week.

Go Jackets!
If we are even more banged up with DL decimated, I agree. A lot of guys had to come back after limping off the field. Sometimes those turn into injuries that keep you out a week after you toughed it through the game.
 

MGTfan

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
698
Location
Atlanta, GA
Did Tech play great? No. But there were some good things. We are getting better.

I don’t know how anyone has watched these pst two games and thinks we are about the same as last year. We are significantly better than last year’s team. UCF is a good team. There’s a reason they rarely lose.

We got blown out last year by teams much worse than UCF.
 

AlabamaBuzz

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,017
Location
Hartselle, AL (originally Rome, GA)
Are we better on D this year? Maybe, but it is still in doubt at this point. (mainly because some of our best haven't played)

Are we better on O this year? Yes, because of talent and an improved O line - still have some gripes about play calling, but I would never be 100% happy. Not having Mason to do some dirty work inside the red zone did hurt us. My biggest concern with Sims is his vision - today he tried to run for 1st downs 2 different times when there was NO way he was going to be able to make it. He should have looked up right before getting to the LOS as there were receivers running open. There usually will be when a D thinks the QB is taking off. Hopefully, he will see this in film and start to think in real time that he needs to keep his eyes downfield. Lastly, his longer throws seemed to lack accuracy today, but maybe that will improve.

Are we better on special teams? Probably, but 4 blocked kicks in 2 weeks is SAD. Harvin is awesome, and our kick coverage and kickoffs have been pretty good so far.
 

wvGT11

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,281
Today sucked, no doubt about that. It would have been nice showcase a new team at home for the opener but that didn't happen. Sims had a rough day, expected for a freshman. Hopefully all the hype from the sports media didn't get to him .. maybe we should have given another qb a chance, but if if sims is going to be our guy he needs a game or two like this to learn.
D was not ready 1st half either , but good adjustments after the half.
 

Pointer

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,801
Did Tech play great? No. But there were some good things. We are getting better.

I don’t know how anyone has watched these pst two games and thinks we are about the same as last year. We are significantly better than last year’s team. UCF is a good team. There’s a reason they rarely lose.

We got blown out last year by teams much worse than UCF.
I think if we weren't missing so many hey guys on defense and CDP was a better coach, we could have won the game. I was actually happy with the defensive performance given all the missing guys, but I said it last week, will say it again this week, doesn't matter how many yards you get on o, if the scoreboard doesn't reflect that, then something's wrong. Granted it's a freshman QB and freshman running back, but the play calling on o was not good today.
 

85Escape

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,450
I'm not a fan of the play calls today either, but you do have to imagine that it would have been difficult for anyone to adjust the planned offense to suddenly losing your starting (and powerful) RB and both of the experienced Tight Ends. I bet if we'd had them I would have been much happier with the play calling.
 

MGTfan

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
698
Location
Atlanta, GA
I had no issues with the play calling. The red zone offense needs to get better, but I think it’s just execution.

My two biggest issues are 1) The FG unit. Absolutely has to improve. 2) Collins’ clock management. The decision to spike the ball at end of first half was awful, despite it not coming back to bite us.
 
Top