Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT needed a change
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 629903" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>CPJ failed to field an even average D after 2008 (which was an Average D). That's why we didn't win more most years. Over the last couple of years we got bit by a less than expected QB, but we still managed to go 5-3 in conference, 2nd in the Coastal last year. Saying that his offense didn't work is just ignorant.</p><p></p><p>With that being said, the OP and others are right that the change needed to happen. The head winds had become too strong.</p><p></p><p>As far as the alternate-history being written, we would still have been hit with Flunk-gate if George had stayed. He's been my favorite GT coach in terms of personality. I think he got the value of clean old fashioned hate much better than Paul, and even better than Bill Curry. Still, George may not have done much better in the post-flunk-gate world than Chan. </p><p></p><p>I still think some may underestimate the impact of APR on the culture compared to the George and Bobby years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 629903, member: 195"] CPJ failed to field an even average D after 2008 (which was an Average D). That's why we didn't win more most years. Over the last couple of years we got bit by a less than expected QB, but we still managed to go 5-3 in conference, 2nd in the Coastal last year. Saying that his offense didn't work is just ignorant. With that being said, the OP and others are right that the change needed to happen. The head winds had become too strong. As far as the alternate-history being written, we would still have been hit with Flunk-gate if George had stayed. He's been my favorite GT coach in terms of personality. I think he got the value of clean old fashioned hate much better than Paul, and even better than Bill Curry. Still, George may not have done much better in the post-flunk-gate world than Chan. I still think some may underestimate the impact of APR on the culture compared to the George and Bobby years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT needed a change
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top