Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT - ND postgame thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4shotB" data-source="post: 758653" data-attributes="member: 844"><p>Thanks for the reply. It looks like I didn't give them enough credit. Apolgies to you and any Gopher fans here. However, the <strong>larger picture</strong> remains: Minnesota beat us in the same fashion that ND did year. That game looked the same in the "eyeball" test and the scores were relatively the same. We looked equally as inept and outclassed like an FCS team playing a ranked FBS team at homecoming. </p><p></p><p>Look at the 2 box scores; GT uv. UM, GT vs. ND - I just did, we had approx. 50 yards more of offense against the Gophers for those that really like to argue minutiae. This underwhelming performance came from a staff that had been in place 10 years here at the Flats which is probably what bothers me the most. Prior to this, I had always felt like GT needed a coach to stay in place for 6-7 years + to really make inrods into the Ga. HS recruiting pipeline. TBH, that looks like that didn't materialize like many of us hoped. We don't need to discuss the reasons. that has been done here already.</p><p></p><p>I am not saying that I know for sure how the CCG era will end. But I do know he inherited a train wreck. Partly due to Paul and partly due to the AD's he worked with. Maybe with Saban and his staff we might look a little sharper, crisper, more efficient on game day - but the bottom line record ain't changing. We are so bad at so many positions that is unreal and harkens back to the day of the "dark days" of the early '80's. This program was left in bad shape and I think trying to judge this staff in year two is absurd. Are they beyond or above criticism at the present time. No the are not. I think they are learning on the job so to speak given their ages and relative experiences. I think year 4 is when you can assess accurately what is happening. Do I like that? No, but I don't like paying taxes or cutting the grass either. IIWII.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4shotB, post: 758653, member: 844"] Thanks for the reply. It looks like I didn't give them enough credit. Apolgies to you and any Gopher fans here. However, the [B]larger picture[/B] remains: Minnesota beat us in the same fashion that ND did year. That game looked the same in the "eyeball" test and the scores were relatively the same. We looked equally as inept and outclassed like an FCS team playing a ranked FBS team at homecoming. Look at the 2 box scores; GT uv. UM, GT vs. ND - I just did, we had approx. 50 yards more of offense against the Gophers for those that really like to argue minutiae. This underwhelming performance came from a staff that had been in place 10 years here at the Flats which is probably what bothers me the most. Prior to this, I had always felt like GT needed a coach to stay in place for 6-7 years + to really make inrods into the Ga. HS recruiting pipeline. TBH, that looks like that didn't materialize like many of us hoped. We don't need to discuss the reasons. that has been done here already. I am not saying that I know for sure how the CCG era will end. But I do know he inherited a train wreck. Partly due to Paul and partly due to the AD's he worked with. Maybe with Saban and his staff we might look a little sharper, crisper, more efficient on game day - but the bottom line record ain't changing. We are so bad at so many positions that is unreal and harkens back to the day of the "dark days" of the early '80's. This program was left in bad shape and I think trying to judge this staff in year two is absurd. Are they beyond or above criticism at the present time. No the are not. I think they are learning on the job so to speak given their ages and relative experiences. I think year 4 is when you can assess accurately what is happening. Do I like that? No, but I don't like paying taxes or cutting the grass either. IIWII. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT - ND postgame thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top