Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
GT / Louisville
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MtnWasp" data-source="post: 693338" data-attributes="member: 4110"><p>Pastner was clearly immature and naive (from a management perspective) to take on an ACC program and it showed in all the year two off the court stuff. But people have to let that stuff go. If we had had a better budget, we could have hired a more savvy manager instead of taking a risk on a younger guy. But that is water under the bridge. </p><p></p><p>Managers can mature over time, learn and become more aware after the bad stuff that happens around them. If the stuff keeps happening, that is a different story. But why fail to support the guy after we have endured his maturation phase?</p><p></p><p>But the team's talent level is higher than it has been for years. Recruiting seems to have picked-up some juice. </p><p>There is enough positive indicators for fans to focus on so that they don't need to be fixated on the rear-view mirror and gnashing their teeth about the past. </p><p></p><p>Failing to support players like Alvarado and Moses Wright because fans are nurturing their butt-hurt from Ron Bell, Darryl LaBarrie/Jarret Jack and the pathetic NCAA is bad form, IMO. </p><p></p><p>The X's and O's are okay. If recruiting continues to trend up and Stansbury can get the program and new locker room and a budget for at least one stud assistant, then I think Pastner could be perfectly fine here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MtnWasp, post: 693338, member: 4110"] Pastner was clearly immature and naive (from a management perspective) to take on an ACC program and it showed in all the year two off the court stuff. But people have to let that stuff go. If we had had a better budget, we could have hired a more savvy manager instead of taking a risk on a younger guy. But that is water under the bridge. Managers can mature over time, learn and become more aware after the bad stuff that happens around them. If the stuff keeps happening, that is a different story. But why fail to support the guy after we have endured his maturation phase? But the team's talent level is higher than it has been for years. Recruiting seems to have picked-up some juice. There is enough positive indicators for fans to focus on so that they don't need to be fixated on the rear-view mirror and gnashing their teeth about the past. Failing to support players like Alvarado and Moses Wright because fans are nurturing their butt-hurt from Ron Bell, Darryl LaBarrie/Jarret Jack and the pathetic NCAA is bad form, IMO. The X's and O's are okay. If recruiting continues to trend up and Stansbury can get the program and new locker room and a budget for at least one stud assistant, then I think Pastner could be perfectly fine here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
GT / Louisville
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top