Iman Shumpert is part of the cast of Season 30 of Dancing With The Stars - season starts on September 20. His pro partner has not been announced yet.
Tech guys usually win the crowd over on this show.First night review from critic Rebecca Iannucci:
Iman Shumpert and pro Daniella Karagach (Jive): Folks, my jaw dropped when I saw Iman keeping up with Daniella during those side-by-side sections. The speed! The grasp on choreography! If Iman stays in the competition, I hope Daniella challenges him with some more legitimate ballroom content, instead of padding routines with groovy interludes like she did here (and often did with last year’s partner, Nelly). But for a Week 1 jive? That was strong. Judges’ Score: 21/40
I agree with you that Pastner has turned what seemed like a weakness into a strength in the past. That said, we are very likely to have something less than the ACC POY at the 5 this season.The issue I have with the take on our big men for next year is that it seems to write off a big jump in production from a spot where we have gotten exactly that 4 of the 5 years Pastner has been here with coch rev.
Lammers as a soph 15 mpg, 3.6 ppg, 4 rpg, 1.3 bpg.
Lammers as a JR 35 mpg, 14.2 ppg, 9.2 rpg, 3.4 bpg
James Banks as a soph ~8 mpg. 2ppg, 2 rpg if we're rounding up. .7 bpg
James Banks as a JR - 30 mpg, 10.5 ppg, 7.7 rpg, 2.5 bpg
Moses Wright as a soph 18.5 mpg. 6.7 ppg, 3.7 rpg, .6 bpg
Moses Wright as a Jr 30.4 mpg, 13 ppg, 7 rpg, 1.1 bpg
Moses Wright as a SR 35.3 mpg, 17 ppg, 8 rpb, 1.6 bpg (also went from .9 assists to 2.3 assists per game)
So I don't think it's fair to say that Pastner has no good option at Center. He has no proven option and it would take a big leap in production for us to the production we need from the 5 spot from any of our options. However, We have gotten exactly that type in increase in production several times already from 3 different players under this staff at that exact position.
I agree with you that Pastner has turned what seemed like a weakness into a strength in the past. That said, we are very likely to have something less than the ACC POY at the 5 this season.
Coleman and Kelly can score from anywhere. Question is - how long to adapt to the defensive schemeBut it is silly to look at it as if it's a math equation where everything else is staying the same. Realistically if we're look at who is to replace Jose and Moses in terms of importance and impact the answer is Mike and Ush. IMO Mike can definately play at a similar level to Moses or Jose and I think Ush has high potential as well. The real question is who will replace the spots they leave behind as 3rd and 4th option. IMO whichever PG wins the starting job is likely to be playing at a level comparable to Ush last year. So will Moore/Coleman be able to step in and give us a third reliable scorer that Devoe was last year? I don't know, but I am very excited about Coleman.
The 5 spot will likely be our weakest spot next year. However I think there is a decent chance we get more production from the 5 spot this year than we got from the 3 spot last year which was our weakest spot.
I don't think that is what I said. It is certainly not what I meant. And, I do not think everything else is staying the same. Certainly our PG position will also be very different in 2021 than in the past four years. Defensively and offensively, the loss of Jose will be felt.But it is silly to look at it as if it's a math equation where everything else is staying the same.