Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Grandma Talent
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YJMD" data-source="post: 803792" data-attributes="member: 1929"><p>We are not in the first or second group for sure. Where we stand in the middle is highly dependent on methodology. Class recruiting ranking across 4 years is a good method, but it will miss out when comparing ratings of people actually on the roster. Looking at the recruiting rating of actual roster members would be much more accurate. That would account for attrition and transfers. That analysis would certainly go in our favor relative to the other (easier) method.</p><p></p><p>Of course, recruiting rating does not tell whether a player is actually any good. For that, you need subjectivity. But that's a lot more likely to reflect bias than actual talent, and given our relative lack of recent success, of course that will color the rating by Athlon. More useful as a gauge of external perception than anything about the roster itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YJMD, post: 803792, member: 1929"] We are not in the first or second group for sure. Where we stand in the middle is highly dependent on methodology. Class recruiting ranking across 4 years is a good method, but it will miss out when comparing ratings of people actually on the roster. Looking at the recruiting rating of actual roster members would be much more accurate. That would account for attrition and transfers. That analysis would certainly go in our favor relative to the other (easier) method. Of course, recruiting rating does not tell whether a player is actually any good. For that, you need subjectivity. But that's a lot more likely to reflect bias than actual talent, and given our relative lack of recent success, of course that will color the rating by Athlon. More useful as a gauge of external perception than anything about the roster itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Grandma Talent
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top