The primary purpose of the football team is to entertain the alumni and the street fans.You’re telling me I pay 30% of my income to the govt for a public school to have a sub 50 graduation rate? Piss on em.
Seriously. How does the NCAA not go
“Ooh, yeah, graduating 40% of your students athletes probably isn’t good”
Like hello? uGA athletes prolly have a what, 10% ish chance to go to the NFL Long term?
So 90% don’t go. So basically almost 50% of uGA athletes are degreeless and have no future in their sport.
That’s a damn shame. It really is. I don’t know how one can ethically call themselves a university and commit themselves to such a high degree of academic malpractice and abuse to their student body.
Some see the football team and college athletics in general as the "front porch" of the institute, generating favorable publicity for the school. There appears to be a correlation between major football success and an increase in applicants to the school, at least in some instances such as Bama. Whether or not this results in a measurable increase in the academic prowess of the student body is still open to debate.The primary purpose of the football team is to entertain the alumni and the street fans.
I can't actually think of a secondary purpose...
Increasing the number of applications received by the admissions office from high school seniors, perhaps?
Is it across all sports? If so, Equestrian, Gymnastics, etc are probably near 100%, so they can afford to have football at 40%.The NCAA implemented Academic Progress Rate (APR) 20 years ago in response to criticism that S-A's were being shortchanged in terms of progressing through school toward a degree. I haven't gone into the weeds of how it is calculated, but significant penalties do exist for failure to meet minimum standards. In its history, there have been substantial penalties imposed on several schools, particularly in their basketball programs. I remain baffled as to how uga manages to meet the minimum APR standard while hitting such a low mark on graduation success.
This is even more puzzling when one considers the relative rigor of the courses of study that some athletes deal with. For their "Turf Management" degree, I would imagine that the 101-level course includes such mind-bogglers as "How to start your mower."
Of course, in today's environment the "substantial penalties" are largely negated since a reduction in scholarships can be offset by NIL, and the more serious postseason ban does not apply to the CFP since it is outside of the NCAA's control.
They may be getting “fake” degrees, but Dabo definitely cares just as much about developing his players off the field as he does on the field. Look how much the Gator Bowl win mattered to him on Saturday. Dabo has been so loyal to his guys that he has essentially refused to recruit out of the transfer portal until this year.As I said to my buddy earlier today -
Clemson is at 99%. So they obviously have their football players in essentially fake degree programs to get them "graduated".
Nothing new there, but it shows that they at least care about the optics of "graduating players."
What's interesting to me is that uga doesn't even bother with that much.
The NCAA site doesn’t give the general student body rate, but you can look it up by individual sport or for all sports For uga, for all sports the most recent number is 86 vs the football team’s 41. Even the men’s basketball team is 23 points higher than the football team.It would also be interesting to see football athlete graduation rates vs general student body for the same school.
+/-%
/
You can lookup graduation rates using the IPEDS Data Center. You can also lookup USG institutions using the "USG by the numbers" website.It would also be interesting to see football athlete graduation rates vs general student body for the same school.
+/-%
/
Turf management is a real degree. Who do you think actually takes care of all the high end fields and golf courses in the US.The NCAA implemented Academic Progress Rate (APR) 20 years ago in response to criticism that S-A's were being shortchanged in terms of progressing through school toward a degree. I haven't gone into the weeds of how it is calculated, but significant penalties do exist for failure to meet minimum standards. In its history, there have been substantial penalties imposed on several schools, particularly in their basketball programs. I remain baffled as to how uga manages to meet the minimum APR standard while hitting such a low mark on graduation success.
This is even more puzzling when one considers the relative rigor of the courses of study that some athletes deal with. For their "Turf Management" degree, I would imagine that the 101-level course includes such mind-bogglers as "How to start your mower."
Of course, in today's environment the "substantial penalties" are largely negated since a reduction in scholarships can be offset by NIL, and the more serious postseason ban does not apply to the CFP since it is outside of the NCAA's control.
You’re correct. I probably shouldn’t have picked on Turf Management. A school can make virtually anything a legitimate field of study with appropriate depth and rigor in the classroom.Turf management is a real degree. Who do you think actually takes care of all the high end fields and golf courses in the US.
Guys like Carl Spackler.Turf management is a real degree. Who do you think actually takes care of all the high end fields and golf courses in the US.
I would suggest that it probably does result in a measurable increase in academic prowess. Being on the north side of Chicago, I know a number of very bright kids who were looking at Alabama, Clemson, and uga because of their football success. It seems that on-the-field success gets the attention of students who would not necessarily think about going to one of those schools, especially from areas like the upper mid-west and the northeast, where the academic scores are generally higher. It's somewhat anecdotal because I'm working with a small population, but there does appear to be a trend.Some see the football team and college athletics in general as the "front porch" of the institute, generating favorable publicity for the school. There appears to be a correlation between major football success and an increase in applicants to the school, at least in some instances such as Bama. Whether or not this results in a measurable increase in the academic prowess of the student body is still open to debate.