Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Glad you asked
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="33jacket" data-source="post: 362512" data-attributes="member: 628"><p>Gt has program issues not coach issues first. </p><p></p><p>Until the athletic board is not made up of 70 percent professors</p><p></p><p>Until the aa can gain some mutual benefits from roll call/joint donation process </p><p></p><p>Until the school allows for some more creative degree offerings and some lesser admission chances in spots</p><p></p><p>Once we can have 9 or so football shadow staff vs 3. </p><p></p><p>Need a new weight/locker room setup. </p><p></p><p>Once we can hire 2-3 more better asst coaches than some who we like, but lets face it can upgrade</p><p></p><p>And honestly; lets face it, kids do rule out tech from the triple option. I am not saying it matters or have a way to assign a percentage. But they do. I have no idea the impact, but it has to be a decent amount. I know kids that went to tech have said they would not have come here if paul was coach. Thats a coach thing. Its the double edge sword with his system cuz it can work fine with the right qb etc. </p><p></p><p>Its not like pauls record is dramatically different than tech the last 40 years. In fact its towards the top. Its a school thing first. </p><p></p><p>Our program and backing is more similar to wake duke bc and cuse than it is to clemson vt miami unc Louisville fsu.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="33jacket, post: 362512, member: 628"] Gt has program issues not coach issues first. Until the athletic board is not made up of 70 percent professors Until the aa can gain some mutual benefits from roll call/joint donation process Until the school allows for some more creative degree offerings and some lesser admission chances in spots Once we can have 9 or so football shadow staff vs 3. Need a new weight/locker room setup. Once we can hire 2-3 more better asst coaches than some who we like, but lets face it can upgrade And honestly; lets face it, kids do rule out tech from the triple option. I am not saying it matters or have a way to assign a percentage. But they do. I have no idea the impact, but it has to be a decent amount. I know kids that went to tech have said they would not have come here if paul was coach. Thats a coach thing. Its the double edge sword with his system cuz it can work fine with the right qb etc. Its not like pauls record is dramatically different than tech the last 40 years. In fact its towards the top. Its a school thing first. Our program and backing is more similar to wake duke bc and cuse than it is to clemson vt miami unc Louisville fsu. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Glad you asked
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top