Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Foreign policy changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskey_Clear" data-source="post: 354936" data-attributes="member: 735"><p>I think he could have sent that same message and still framed it in a "more presidential" manner. That's unfortunately not his style.</p><p></p><p>I am glad he has put other nations on notice that we are no longer interested in carrying all of their water for them.</p><p></p><p>DPRK and Iran will continue to be huge problems for the foreseeable future. We can only do so much unilaterally, short of military action. We need to be real clear with Russia and China that we observe their contributions to those nations' weapons programs as direct involvement in any future hostile actions initiated by either.</p><p></p><p>Are the possible implications of that scary as hell? Absolutely. So is sitting back, not doing anything, and allowing Russia and China to use either or both as proxies against us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskey_Clear, post: 354936, member: 735"] I think he could have sent that same message and still framed it in a "more presidential" manner. That's unfortunately not his style. I am glad he has put other nations on notice that we are no longer interested in carrying all of their water for them. DPRK and Iran will continue to be huge problems for the foreseeable future. We can only do so much unilaterally, short of military action. We need to be real clear with Russia and China that we observe their contributions to those nations' weapons programs as direct involvement in any future hostile actions initiated by either. Are the possible implications of that scary as hell? Absolutely. So is sitting back, not doing anything, and allowing Russia and China to use either or both as proxies against us. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Foreign policy changes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top