Dude, we’re here to talk about novels and great literature.With Oklahoma and Texas inquiring about the $ec, how hard does the ACC go after PSU, OSU, Michigan and ND(already in our sight according to commish)?
With Oklahoma and Texas inquiring about the $ec, how hard does the ACC go after PSU, OSU, Michigan and ND(already in our sight according to commish)?
If we can find the degrees of separation between Saul Bellow and Philip Roth I believe we can squeeze both Notre Dame and Texas into the ACC.Dude, we’re here to talk about novels and great literature.
For what it’s worth, Texas A&M and Missouri are both hard “no”, Ole Miss and Miss State are probably also both no, and four no votes are enough to kill it. It would be tight to get the votes. Oklahoma can’t go without Oklahoma State (the Oklahoma legislature will kill it). However, Texas is looking for a home outside the B12. I don’t think Texas would end up in the ACC, but it’s not impossible. B1G would fit them if they could get it.
I don’t think that will affect our record this year.
At the ACC Media Days, Collins is all positive. I haven’t pulled anything from that meeting that would change my perceptions on the season, other that Eley is bigger than I thought.
This is an interesting topic for speculation.Probably the other way around. SEC would probably take Clemson, FSU, NC State, and VT and the B1G would take UVA, UNC, GT, Miami?, ND, and god knows what else.
What's the point of a 16 team conference? It's really two conferences and then a championship game. The SECW will be Oklahoma, Texas, A&M, LSU, MSU, Ole Piss. Arkansas and Missouri? The SECE would be Florida, Georgia, SC, Tennessee, Kentucky, Vandy, Alabama, and Auburn?
Interesting POV.That’s the great thing about Tech being in the ATL. We would be a big draw for the Big10 to get the southern market and the eyeballs of all their Alumni transplants. I think we can shake out a winner no matter what. If we are asked again I think we should probably jump on it. Their payouts are larger and there is good basketball in the Big10 as well.
Everyone used to hate everyone else in their conference and now you have to pull for other members as if they are your team. I don’t care about the ACC. Chase the $$$$$$
I don't believe the B1G would come after Tech. again.I would highly doubt the ACC could pull anyone out of the B1G. Of course you try for PSU or OSU but OSU only goes with Mich. PSU overlaps markets with Pitt.
IF IF IF, the SEC goes for Texas and Oklahoma, I would think the ACC goes after ND (obviously) and West Virginia. Then the race is on to keep current members from jumping to B1G.
With that in mind, GT would be a big target for B1G. Do we entertain the idea of jumping ship for the B1G? If so, then I think ACC goes after TCU to fill that spot. Then B1G would go after maybe a Syracuse or BC maybe? Possibly Louisville?
Obviously this blows up the Big 12. I think the remaining teams would merge with the upper class of Mountain West and maybe a Sun Belt or two. Possibly create something new entirely.
This is an interesting topic for speculation.
I see the three strongest conferences are the SEC, the B1G, and the Pac-12 (for geographic reasons).
Atlanta market is too big to just pass up. Why not try again? Pride? With the SEC at 16 members, that’ll be the new race. No other team is attainable and breaks them into the southern market like we do. This would give them a bigger incentive plus they already got NYC with Rutgers last time.I don't believe the B1G would come after Tech. again.
Probably the other way around. SEC would probably take Clemson, FSU, NC State, and VT and the B1G would take UVA, UNC, GT, Miami?, ND, and god knows what else.
What's the point of a 16 team conference? It's really two conferences and then a championship game. The SECW will be Oklahoma, Texas, A&M, LSU, MSU, Ole Piss. Arkansas and Missouri? The SECE would be Florida, Georgia, SC, Tennessee, Kentucky, Vandy, Alabama, and Auburn?