Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Execution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 472894" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>The highlighted item is where my disagreement with you is in regards to the statements about "execution". I don't believe that when the coach and the players say they what they need to worry about is "execution" and not the opponent they are saying every body must destroy the person they are blocking. They are saying that the team must "execute" their part of the scheme. It is harder to completely block a mike linebacker who is NFL caliber. However even just getting to that level and making him redirect can be the difference between a 3 yard loss and a 3 yard gain. Timing and spacing can be messed up if someone makes it directly to the backfield. However, in the Clemson game there were pitch guys who were either very close to the QB or were behind the QB. I believe on one of the fumbled pitches the pitch man was due South of the QB. There is no reason from what anybody on the defense was doing for him to be in that position. If you watch the [USER=402]@Longestday[/USER] review of the offense it isn't too hard to tell when an offensive player is just beaten and when he just flat out does the wrong thing. </p><p></p><p>There are even execution things that can be highlighted about the defense. In the [USER=29]@Ibeeballin[/USER] review of the Louisville game there is a play in which the linebacker that should shoot toward the gap slides sideways. He gets in the way of the linebacker who is supposed to slide sideways. A runner gets through the gap and one blocker is able to interrupt both linebackers because the "shoot" LB is already in the way of the "slide" LB.</p><p></p><p>For special teams, in the USF game, [USER=29]@Ibeeballin[/USER] pointed out the issues with where the cover team was. The people that were supposed to stay back charged forward. That left only one level of coverage. When the returner got past the single layer of coverage it was easy at that point to score the TD. The cover team did that twice in a row.</p><p></p><p>Even if the LBs are in position a super player could beat them. In 1980 a Tennessee LB was in perfect position and lined up for a perfect form tackle when the mutt RB just flat out ran over him. Even if the kickoff cover team is on the correct level a super returner could beat both levels and score a TD. Even if an offensive lineman goes to the second level a super mike LB could get ahead of or around him and make a tackle. However, if the Tennessee LB had not even been there, the mutt RB would have been guaranteed a TD without having to make a super play. If the cover team collapses to one level, the make it easy for the returner to score a TD. If the linemen don't even attempt to block the mike LB, then he is guaranteed to make tackles for a loss.</p><p></p><p>It seems to me that your issue is with the word "execution". If they said "If everyone sticks to their assignment we have a chance to win", would you disagree with that? That is what I believe they are saying when they use the word execution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 472894, member: 2426"] The highlighted item is where my disagreement with you is in regards to the statements about "execution". I don't believe that when the coach and the players say they what they need to worry about is "execution" and not the opponent they are saying every body must destroy the person they are blocking. They are saying that the team must "execute" their part of the scheme. It is harder to completely block a mike linebacker who is NFL caliber. However even just getting to that level and making him redirect can be the difference between a 3 yard loss and a 3 yard gain. Timing and spacing can be messed up if someone makes it directly to the backfield. However, in the Clemson game there were pitch guys who were either very close to the QB or were behind the QB. I believe on one of the fumbled pitches the pitch man was due South of the QB. There is no reason from what anybody on the defense was doing for him to be in that position. If you watch the [USER=402]@Longestday[/USER] review of the offense it isn't too hard to tell when an offensive player is just beaten and when he just flat out does the wrong thing. There are even execution things that can be highlighted about the defense. In the [USER=29]@Ibeeballin[/USER] review of the Louisville game there is a play in which the linebacker that should shoot toward the gap slides sideways. He gets in the way of the linebacker who is supposed to slide sideways. A runner gets through the gap and one blocker is able to interrupt both linebackers because the "shoot" LB is already in the way of the "slide" LB. For special teams, in the USF game, [USER=29]@Ibeeballin[/USER] pointed out the issues with where the cover team was. The people that were supposed to stay back charged forward. That left only one level of coverage. When the returner got past the single layer of coverage it was easy at that point to score the TD. The cover team did that twice in a row. Even if the LBs are in position a super player could beat them. In 1980 a Tennessee LB was in perfect position and lined up for a perfect form tackle when the mutt RB just flat out ran over him. Even if the kickoff cover team is on the correct level a super returner could beat both levels and score a TD. Even if an offensive lineman goes to the second level a super mike LB could get ahead of or around him and make a tackle. However, if the Tennessee LB had not even been there, the mutt RB would have been guaranteed a TD without having to make a super play. If the cover team collapses to one level, the make it easy for the returner to score a TD. If the linemen don't even attempt to block the mike LB, then he is guaranteed to make tackles for a loss. It seems to me that your issue is with the word "execution". If they said "If everyone sticks to their assignment we have a chance to win", would you disagree with that? That is what I believe they are saying when they use the word execution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Execution
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top