Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Enough is enough...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Technut1990" data-source="post: 666939" data-attributes="member: 3774"><p>Id go further and say about 99% of our talks are noise. Its fans being fans. The guys who played and have real info, don't post it for the most part due to loyalties (understandable). This board was a place to actually talk football for the less informed, like me. I've watched enough football in my life to recognize some of what I see. I don't articulate it well because I don't know the language to the extent others do. The problem for me is that I cant avoid giving the attitude back and that gets me in trouble. This isn't a film room where everyone is familiar with the lingo, personnel assignments/ info or administrative talk but it doesn't mean that I cant see the difference between man and zone. </p><p></p><p>The last argument I got into I got warned after "someone" complained on me. I knew I would get in trouble but in correcting me the moderator told me that he didn't monitor the others post (those who I was arguing with) but just read mine after the complaint and thought it was to much. Now don't get me wrong. I was pissed and got out of line with my offending post, but how do you understand context if you don't review the entire argument ? How do you know where responsibility lies ? I understand that in football the one who throws the second punch usually gets the penalty but don't we have the ability to review an entire argument and see who really threw the first punch ? </p><p></p><p>It can become a free for all when those in charge of reprimands cant get an understanding of the entire picture. Allowing those who seem to need to correct others by condescension, to go untouched is infuriating and one sided and ADDS to the issue in my view. Either we fight or we "investigate" the complaints and reprimand the correct parties (plural). OR we outright ban the coach loyalty gangs (meaning the ones who jump people in defense of a certain coach or prod others by promoting a certain coach).</p><p></p><p>I'm pro Tech I don't care who the coach is. If I ask a question i'm not after the coach and I don't think most of us are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Technut1990, post: 666939, member: 3774"] Id go further and say about 99% of our talks are noise. Its fans being fans. The guys who played and have real info, don't post it for the most part due to loyalties (understandable). This board was a place to actually talk football for the less informed, like me. I've watched enough football in my life to recognize some of what I see. I don't articulate it well because I don't know the language to the extent others do. The problem for me is that I cant avoid giving the attitude back and that gets me in trouble. This isn't a film room where everyone is familiar with the lingo, personnel assignments/ info or administrative talk but it doesn't mean that I cant see the difference between man and zone. The last argument I got into I got warned after "someone" complained on me. I knew I would get in trouble but in correcting me the moderator told me that he didn't monitor the others post (those who I was arguing with) but just read mine after the complaint and thought it was to much. Now don't get me wrong. I was pissed and got out of line with my offending post, but how do you understand context if you don't review the entire argument ? How do you know where responsibility lies ? I understand that in football the one who throws the second punch usually gets the penalty but don't we have the ability to review an entire argument and see who really threw the first punch ? It can become a free for all when those in charge of reprimands cant get an understanding of the entire picture. Allowing those who seem to need to correct others by condescension, to go untouched is infuriating and one sided and ADDS to the issue in my view. Either we fight or we "investigate" the complaints and reprimand the correct parties (plural). OR we outright ban the coach loyalty gangs (meaning the ones who jump people in defense of a certain coach or prod others by promoting a certain coach). I'm pro Tech I don't care who the coach is. If I ask a question i'm not after the coach and I don't think most of us are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Enough is enough...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top