Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Do you hold scholarships all the way to signing day?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bruce Wayne" data-source="post: 9390" data-attributes="member: 231"><p>I need help on this topic since holding scholarships to signing day means risking not hitting your number. By the way, sorry for the length of my posts to start threads. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> <img src="http://gtswarm.com/community/file:///C:\Users\CATHLE~1\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image001.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Since CPJ does not oversign, a stance I completely agree with as proper and ethical, then here is a strategy I may follow to try and hit my number.<strong>** </strong> </p><p></p><p>First, I would keep a running average over say the past 5 years to estimate how much extra attrition I can reasonably expect to have in the last 2 months of a recruiting year (academic disqualifiers, decommits, etc.). Plus I would get the average for post-signing day attrition (draft, players quitting team in spring, getting kicked off, etc.). </p><p></p><p>Then I would take the<em> pre-signing day average</em> attrition minus 1 or 2 (to be safe) plus the number of seniors/available scholarships and get a number and recruit to that.</p><p></p><p>Next, I believe a strong walk-on program is great for Tech b/c the education is attractive enough, plus comparatively reasonably priced, that you stand a good chance of getting high caliber walk-ons. To have a strong walk-on program kids need to know that earning a scholarship is possible. So I would use my <em>post-signing day average</em> attrition to both recruit walk-ons/transfers and . . . . <strong>here is where I get controversial</strong> . . . sign elite recruits who want to wait to signing day or beyond.</p><p></p><p>That means, I would only "hold" a scholarship open until signing day for a silent commit.</p><p></p><p>I would tell those kids that want to have hat picking ceremonies on signing day:</p><p></p><p>"That's fine but here is how a scholarship to Tech works. I am trying to hit X number on signing day. Therefore, I will accept commits up to that number and am not holding one for you past Y-date. Even Calvin Johnson was able to make his decision and committed on Jan. 12, 3-4 weeks <em>before </em>signing day. I want you at Tech and if I hit my number AND all my commits actually do send in their letters on signing day then I will <em>not </em>have a scholarship for you on that day. But experience tells me that I get decommits the very week of signing day or attrition after signing day on an average of X scholarships a year. Normally I use those for transfers or walk-ons but if you want to wait to signing day or beyond then you will be first in line for one of those. So if one came available from a decommit then cool, we take your LOI on signing day, if not then you need to wait or greyshirt."</p><p></p><p>What do you think?</p><p></p><p>The sticky part is that it is conceivable that one signing day you have an elite prospect pick a Tech hat but you had no decommits and you have to tell the kid to hold on for post-signing day attrition or agree to greyshirt in order to avoid oversigning. Certain people in the fanbase would freak out over that. </p><p></p><p>For my part I would be amused at that situation as I do not think adults should coddle the egos of teenagers no matter the level of athletic ability they display. I prefer giving yourself the best chance to hit your number possible.</p><p></p><p><strong>**Please note that I am NOT criticizing CPJ's recruiting approach or strategy, since only he and his coaches really know it in detail; instead I am treating the topic abstractly.**</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bruce Wayne, post: 9390, member: 231"] I need help on this topic since holding scholarships to signing day means risking not hitting your number. By the way, sorry for the length of my posts to start threads. :( [IMG]http://gtswarm.com/community/file:///C:\Users\CATHLE~1\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image001.png[/IMG] Since CPJ does not oversign, a stance I completely agree with as proper and ethical, then here is a strategy I may follow to try and hit my number.[B]** [/B] First, I would keep a running average over say the past 5 years to estimate how much extra attrition I can reasonably expect to have in the last 2 months of a recruiting year (academic disqualifiers, decommits, etc.). Plus I would get the average for post-signing day attrition (draft, players quitting team in spring, getting kicked off, etc.). Then I would take the[I] pre-signing day average[/I] attrition minus 1 or 2 (to be safe) plus the number of seniors/available scholarships and get a number and recruit to that. Next, I believe a strong walk-on program is great for Tech b/c the education is attractive enough, plus comparatively reasonably priced, that you stand a good chance of getting high caliber walk-ons. To have a strong walk-on program kids need to know that earning a scholarship is possible. So I would use my [I]post-signing day average[/I] attrition to both recruit walk-ons/transfers and . . . . [B]here is where I get controversial[/B] . . . sign elite recruits who want to wait to signing day or beyond. That means, I would only "hold" a scholarship open until signing day for a silent commit. I would tell those kids that want to have hat picking ceremonies on signing day: "That's fine but here is how a scholarship to Tech works. I am trying to hit X number on signing day. Therefore, I will accept commits up to that number and am not holding one for you past Y-date. Even Calvin Johnson was able to make his decision and committed on Jan. 12, 3-4 weeks [I]before [/I]signing day. I want you at Tech and if I hit my number AND all my commits actually do send in their letters on signing day then I will [I]not [/I]have a scholarship for you on that day. But experience tells me that I get decommits the very week of signing day or attrition after signing day on an average of X scholarships a year. Normally I use those for transfers or walk-ons but if you want to wait to signing day or beyond then you will be first in line for one of those. So if one came available from a decommit then cool, we take your LOI on signing day, if not then you need to wait or greyshirt." What do you think? The sticky part is that it is conceivable that one signing day you have an elite prospect pick a Tech hat but you had no decommits and you have to tell the kid to hold on for post-signing day attrition or agree to greyshirt in order to avoid oversigning. Certain people in the fanbase would freak out over that. For my part I would be amused at that situation as I do not think adults should coddle the egos of teenagers no matter the level of athletic ability they display. I prefer giving yourself the best chance to hit your number possible. [B]**Please note that I am NOT criticizing CPJ's recruiting approach or strategy, since only he and his coaches really know it in detail; instead I am treating the topic abstractly.**[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Do you hold scholarships all the way to signing day?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top