Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Defense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tech_wreck47" data-source="post: 348231" data-attributes="member: 2346"><p>I agree it was all in the play book, it just wasn't used as often as it is now. I think it's a combination of what you have said, guys in the system longer etc And what others are saying, more aggressive play calling. To say it's mainly because of better athletes is crazy though imo. We have been way more aggressive whether anyone wants to believe it or not. Safeties playing up, corners in more press coverage, stunts etc has been different, all you have to do is turn the film on to see that. Credit is deserved for CTR (play calling, and good game plan) CPJ (saying we need to be more aggressive) and the players (being more fundamentally sound).</p><p></p><p>IMO the 3 biggest improvements are tackling, play calling, and eye placement (we haven't been out of position nearly as much (imo that's because of guys being in the system longer and the play calling is allowing them to pin their ears back and go instead of read and react) </p><p></p><p>I've been impressed with the D so far and even though I have wanted Roof gone, I have said many times if he can get things turned around I'm fine. It looks like he has done just that and if it continues I'd be glad for him to stay. The D will be tested in atleast 4 of our final 7 games but from what I have seen out of them I see no reason why we can't end up as a top 40 D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tech_wreck47, post: 348231, member: 2346"] I agree it was all in the play book, it just wasn't used as often as it is now. I think it's a combination of what you have said, guys in the system longer etc And what others are saying, more aggressive play calling. To say it's mainly because of better athletes is crazy though imo. We have been way more aggressive whether anyone wants to believe it or not. Safeties playing up, corners in more press coverage, stunts etc has been different, all you have to do is turn the film on to see that. Credit is deserved for CTR (play calling, and good game plan) CPJ (saying we need to be more aggressive) and the players (being more fundamentally sound). IMO the 3 biggest improvements are tackling, play calling, and eye placement (we haven't been out of position nearly as much (imo that's because of guys being in the system longer and the play calling is allowing them to pin their ears back and go instead of read and react) I've been impressed with the D so far and even though I have wanted Roof gone, I have said many times if he can get things turned around I'm fine. It looks like he has done just that and if it continues I'd be glad for him to stay. The D will be tested in atleast 4 of our final 7 games but from what I have seen out of them I see no reason why we can't end up as a top 40 D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Defense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top