Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CPJ interview - Nov 11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgtengineer" data-source="post: 664989" data-attributes="member: 3094"><p>Somewhat true, however WHen GT has been most successful we have ran some variation of option football. Now it hasn't always been from the wishbone (Dodd, Rodgers) Or the flex (johnson) but our best success has come from offenses that included it. Fridge ran a ton of option just out of multiple sets even Nix's best offense was based of what would later be the Zone Read schemes. So if we want to go since Dodd.</p><p></p><p>Dodd - Wishbone (late) </p><p>Carson - Wishbone Defense lead team (we fired him for not winning 8 games a year and he went on to revolutonize the NFL with the steelers 3-4/)</p><p>Rodgers -Wishbone option</p><p>Curry - New Fangled offense called west coast paired with power run. It failed.</p><p>Ross - Fridge offense Multiple option run and shoot. (was good but not at first with Curry's players.)</p><p>****** - dumpster fire offense</p><p>O'leary - Fridge 2.0 More option.</p><p>Gailey - Prostyle with spread concepts (early) Power run and Air Coryall concepts late (05-07)</p><p>Johnson- Spread option with run an shoot. (more run oriented and option heavy here than some other places he coached)</p><p>Collins - Dumpster fire 2.0 (would say multiple spread but I couldn't tell you what we were going to run week to week this year we really did change offenses with each QB during the three QB experiment and then once graham got it we seemed to also waver) </p><p></p><p>But basically through pretty much all of GT's history from 1956 forward we have been option based more than we have not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgtengineer, post: 664989, member: 3094"] Somewhat true, however WHen GT has been most successful we have ran some variation of option football. Now it hasn't always been from the wishbone (Dodd, Rodgers) Or the flex (johnson) but our best success has come from offenses that included it. Fridge ran a ton of option just out of multiple sets even Nix's best offense was based of what would later be the Zone Read schemes. So if we want to go since Dodd. Dodd - Wishbone (late) Carson - Wishbone Defense lead team (we fired him for not winning 8 games a year and he went on to revolutonize the NFL with the steelers 3-4/) Rodgers -Wishbone option Curry - New Fangled offense called west coast paired with power run. It failed. Ross - Fridge offense Multiple option run and shoot. (was good but not at first with Curry's players.) ****** - dumpster fire offense O'leary - Fridge 2.0 More option. Gailey - Prostyle with spread concepts (early) Power run and Air Coryall concepts late (05-07) Johnson- Spread option with run an shoot. (more run oriented and option heavy here than some other places he coached) Collins - Dumpster fire 2.0 (would say multiple spread but I couldn't tell you what we were going to run week to week this year we really did change offenses with each QB during the three QB experiment and then once graham got it we seemed to also waver) But basically through pretty much all of GT's history from 1956 forward we have been option based more than we have not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CPJ interview - Nov 11
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top