Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CPJ interview - Nov 11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BleedGoldNWhite21" data-source="post: 658520" data-attributes="member: 2993"><p>The scheme had no affect on defensive recruiting. The offense didn’t really need any better recruiting. We were constantly in the top 30 in scoring every year. And if we were able to build a better defense we could have easily averaged around 10 wins a season without changing our offensive players. If we were winning like that then we’d probably have gotten more talent on offense eventually too because people like to play for a winner.</p><p></p><p>Our Points per game:</p><p></p><p>2018: 33</p><p>2017: 27.2</p><p>2016: 27.7</p><p>2015: 25.6</p><p>2014: 37.8</p><p>2013: 29.1</p><p>2012: 31.6</p><p>2011: 31.9</p><p>2010: 24.8</p><p>2009: 33.5</p><p>2008: 24.2</p><p></p><p>Now look at points per game for the 50th best Defense every year:</p><p>2018: 25.9</p><p>2017: 26.1</p><p>2016: 26.7</p><p>2015: 26.5</p><p>2014: 26.2(It was us!)</p><p>2013: 25.8</p><p>2012: 26.6</p><p>2011: 25.3</p><p>2010: 24.7</p><p>2009: 24.8</p><p>2008: 23.6</p><p></p><p>A 50th ranked defense is not asking for much. That would have been enough for us to win a lot of games with the exact same offense. Now, was poor defensive recruiting/development primarily a money thing or primarily a flaw of CPJ? That’s up for debate, but I would guess the chances of succeeding on that side would be better with more money than without it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BleedGoldNWhite21, post: 658520, member: 2993"] The scheme had no affect on defensive recruiting. The offense didn’t really need any better recruiting. We were constantly in the top 30 in scoring every year. And if we were able to build a better defense we could have easily averaged around 10 wins a season without changing our offensive players. If we were winning like that then we’d probably have gotten more talent on offense eventually too because people like to play for a winner. Our Points per game: 2018: 33 2017: 27.2 2016: 27.7 2015: 25.6 2014: 37.8 2013: 29.1 2012: 31.6 2011: 31.9 2010: 24.8 2009: 33.5 2008: 24.2 Now look at points per game for the 50th best Defense every year: 2018: 25.9 2017: 26.1 2016: 26.7 2015: 26.5 2014: 26.2(It was us!) 2013: 25.8 2012: 26.6 2011: 25.3 2010: 24.7 2009: 24.8 2008: 23.6 A 50th ranked defense is not asking for much. That would have been enough for us to win a lot of games with the exact same offense. Now, was poor defensive recruiting/development primarily a money thing or primarily a flaw of CPJ? That’s up for debate, but I would guess the chances of succeeding on that side would be better with more money than without it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CPJ interview - Nov 11
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top