Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
College Playoff Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ggee87" data-source="post: 105426" data-attributes="member: 1066"><p>I said this early on in the year... Ole Miss was WAY overrated. They have almost zero on offense. Bo Wallace is a terrible QB. There has to be a way to quantify how good a team is coming out of 1 season and heading into the next. If you have a bunch of starters returning from a good team... you may deserve to be ranked high early in the year. But when this committee ranks USCe and Texas AM highly when they both replaced starting QBs, WRs and defensive studs... I dont get the reasoning behind that. So when they prerank undeserving.teams.highly like that... ofcourse another team like Miss St. and Ole Miss are going to have killer resumes. Especially when the committee people are saying that its about where the team is ranked when you beat them. Its clear bias on their part. No ifs, ands, or.buts about.it. I wish they would come up with a decent formula for ranking teams going into the next season or just scrap preseason rankings altogether. When the SEC has the best 1 loss, 2 loss, 3 loss, 4 loss and so forth teams... How can u say thats not bias, and keep a straight face?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ggee87, post: 105426, member: 1066"] I said this early on in the year... Ole Miss was WAY overrated. They have almost zero on offense. Bo Wallace is a terrible QB. There has to be a way to quantify how good a team is coming out of 1 season and heading into the next. If you have a bunch of starters returning from a good team... you may deserve to be ranked high early in the year. But when this committee ranks USCe and Texas AM highly when they both replaced starting QBs, WRs and defensive studs... I dont get the reasoning behind that. So when they prerank undeserving.teams.highly like that... ofcourse another team like Miss St. and Ole Miss are going to have killer resumes. Especially when the committee people are saying that its about where the team is ranked when you beat them. Its clear bias on their part. No ifs, ands, or.buts about.it. I wish they would come up with a decent formula for ranking teams going into the next season or just scrap preseason rankings altogether. When the SEC has the best 1 loss, 2 loss, 3 loss, 4 loss and so forth teams... How can u say thats not bias, and keep a straight face? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
College Playoff Rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top