Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
College Playoff Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Squints" data-source="post: 102628" data-attributes="member: 822"><p>I agree with just about everything your saying except I actually think you can make a case for Utah being ahead of us. Outside the WSU loss the teams they have lost to are two the #2 team and #15 team which beat the #2 team. I'm not sure I would have put them above us personally but I don't think that one is egregious. But other than that it doesn't look good.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I actually think it's a good idea for people like Rice and the general to be there if they've proven to have a solid working knowledge of the sport. The people I want on the committee completely independent from the system. The working knowledge is pretty key there though. </p><p></p><p>I think it's the people who are currently or recently involved with CFB that are the biggest issue. They can't overcome their perceptions. I think we're as low as we are because of who we are. They had no faith in us at the beginning of the season and think we're a sham now because of what they thought at the beginning of the year. It looks as if they're not giving the on field results the weight they said they would. When a team like Alabama or Oregon, who've got people slurping them, loses one game they don't fall very far and they shoot back up the rankings when they win. I have zero faith that would happen to us or any of the more covered schools and I think that's bull****.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Squints, post: 102628, member: 822"] I agree with just about everything your saying except I actually think you can make a case for Utah being ahead of us. Outside the WSU loss the teams they have lost to are two the #2 team and #15 team which beat the #2 team. I'm not sure I would have put them above us personally but I don't think that one is egregious. But other than that it doesn't look good. I actually think it's a good idea for people like Rice and the general to be there if they've proven to have a solid working knowledge of the sport. The people I want on the committee completely independent from the system. The working knowledge is pretty key there though. I think it's the people who are currently or recently involved with CFB that are the biggest issue. They can't overcome their perceptions. I think we're as low as we are because of who we are. They had no faith in us at the beginning of the season and think we're a sham now because of what they thought at the beginning of the year. It looks as if they're not giving the on field results the weight they said they would. When a team like Alabama or Oregon, who've got people slurping them, loses one game they don't fall very far and they shoot back up the rankings when they win. I have zero faith that would happen to us or any of the more covered schools and I think that's bull****. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
College Playoff Rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top