Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
College Football "Brand" Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskey_Clear" data-source="post: 420904" data-attributes="member: 735"><p>I hear y’all. And I don’t completely disagree. As a fan I wanna see us play tough traditional rivals in OOC games. And I want to beat em all. </p><p></p><p>But there is reason to schedule softer opponents OOC. First is our annual match with Clem. Puts us at a clear disadvantage when competing for the coastal crown. Add another tough opponent OOC and that’s one more game of hard fatigue and additional injuries that might be more easily avoided with a pasty where we might play depth guys more. Second is records matter and a softer schedule will equate to a better record. Just see UCF last year for evidence of this.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line, I see both sides of the argument. My greedy self would schedule Aubie, UF, UT, bama, and Notre Dame annually. But then I also wouldn’t ***** and moan for not going undefeated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskey_Clear, post: 420904, member: 735"] I hear y’all. And I don’t completely disagree. As a fan I wanna see us play tough traditional rivals in OOC games. And I want to beat em all. But there is reason to schedule softer opponents OOC. First is our annual match with Clem. Puts us at a clear disadvantage when competing for the coastal crown. Add another tough opponent OOC and that’s one more game of hard fatigue and additional injuries that might be more easily avoided with a pasty where we might play depth guys more. Second is records matter and a softer schedule will equate to a better record. Just see UCF last year for evidence of this. Bottom line, I see both sides of the argument. My greedy self would schedule Aubie, UF, UT, bama, and Notre Dame annually. But then I also wouldn’t ***** and moan for not going undefeated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
College Football "Brand" Rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top