Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Coaching Carousel 5 - You have to look through the rain to see the rainbow
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="glandon1960" data-source="post: 673947" data-attributes="member: 2458"><p>Letting Pastner go without 'upgrade' replacement only makes you feel good for short while and pushes out any long term improvements for 3-4 years. I am not in favor of that route. </p><p>As bad as last night was, I did not see lack of effort. Lack of focus at times, but not lack of effort.</p><p></p><p>The thing I am questioning is - Are we running a style/system of offense that works well for the talent we have?</p><p>First couple of years, the Princeton style worked and fit the players - Lammers was effectively a point center and we (almost) never played with two bigs on the floor.</p><p>This years personnel do not fit that style as well. Moses is not a significant threat on the perimeter (to pass, shoot, drive), Banks scores in the low post and getting it low/kicking out if necessary is another way to create offense from the center (vs. having him pass from FT line where he is little threat to score).</p><p></p><p>Teams have figured out to key/focus on Devoe - no one else has shown ability to create their or others shots. The best way to defend us is to play sagging man-man that stays out on Devoe - clogs cutters/restricts penetration, and gives chance to recover on 3's (which we as shooting worse than last year which I though would be impossible to do over this long a stretch).</p><p></p><p>Being 300+ our of @350 teams in offensive efficiency needs to change</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="glandon1960, post: 673947, member: 2458"] Letting Pastner go without 'upgrade' replacement only makes you feel good for short while and pushes out any long term improvements for 3-4 years. I am not in favor of that route. As bad as last night was, I did not see lack of effort. Lack of focus at times, but not lack of effort. The thing I am questioning is - Are we running a style/system of offense that works well for the talent we have? First couple of years, the Princeton style worked and fit the players - Lammers was effectively a point center and we (almost) never played with two bigs on the floor. This years personnel do not fit that style as well. Moses is not a significant threat on the perimeter (to pass, shoot, drive), Banks scores in the low post and getting it low/kicking out if necessary is another way to create offense from the center (vs. having him pass from FT line where he is little threat to score). Teams have figured out to key/focus on Devoe - no one else has shown ability to create their or others shots. The best way to defend us is to play sagging man-man that stays out on Devoe - clogs cutters/restricts penetration, and gives chance to recover on 3's (which we as shooting worse than last year which I though would be impossible to do over this long a stretch). Being 300+ our of @350 teams in offensive efficiency needs to change [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Coaching Carousel 5 - You have to look through the rain to see the rainbow
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top