Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CGC on 680 this AM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 867511" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>I believe there are some inferences in those statements. There was an anonymous informant who told the AJC that donors had raised the money for the buyout. I don't know if that is an accurate statement from a source that had direct knowledge or not. Even if true, I don't know if that included money to get a new coach or only all or maybe even just most of the buyout money. One donor was quoted in the AJC as saying:</p><p></p><p>Is that sentiment because CGC wasn't fired, or because TStan was all-in and referred to him as "my man"?</p><p></p><p>I would rather not lose TStan next year if football doesn't recover. I understand that football is the highest revenue and the highest visibility sport. However, the athletic association and most of the sports are in much better condition than they were under MBob. Fund raising is up. Most sports are doing better. Even association support for football is much higher than it was. (although it appears that MBob was intentionally trying to starve the football program of resources.) IF football doesn't recover this year, the program could only go up with a different coach. The athletic association is in pretty good shape at the moment. If TStan is replaced, the association could get even better, but there is also the potential of a significant drop off.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 867511, member: 2426"] I believe there are some inferences in those statements. There was an anonymous informant who told the AJC that donors had raised the money for the buyout. I don't know if that is an accurate statement from a source that had direct knowledge or not. Even if true, I don't know if that included money to get a new coach or only all or maybe even just most of the buyout money. One donor was quoted in the AJC as saying: Is that sentiment because CGC wasn't fired, or because TStan was all-in and referred to him as "my man"? I would rather not lose TStan next year if football doesn't recover. I understand that football is the highest revenue and the highest visibility sport. However, the athletic association and most of the sports are in much better condition than they were under MBob. Fund raising is up. Most sports are doing better. Even association support for football is much higher than it was. (although it appears that MBob was intentionally trying to starve the football program of resources.) IF football doesn't recover this year, the program could only go up with a different coach. The athletic association is in pretty good shape at the moment. If TStan is replaced, the association could get even better, but there is also the potential of a significant drop off. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CGC on 680 this AM
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top