Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP unanimously approves 5+7 model for new 12-team playoff
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bobongo" data-source="post: 1003163" data-attributes="member: 3893"><p>This was the statement that I said we all know:</p><p></p><p>"Again, "average" teams do nothing to move the national needle. Perception is based on the top teams. Perception translates to eyeballs on tv, which translates to $$$. Games between middling teams (in any conference) do not matter when it comes to the $$."</p><p></p><p>I don't see anything in that statement that we don't all know. We all know perception is based on the teams at the top. That isn't the issue. The issue is whether those perceptions are <em>valid</em> when it comes to conference comparisons, whether conferences should be compared based on just what's on top or all of the conferences, top to bottom. Since the top teams play the other teams, the middling ones and the bottom feeders, and base their reputations in large part based on those games, I don't see how ignoring the middle and bottom of the conferences makes for any valid comparison.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bobongo, post: 1003163, member: 3893"] This was the statement that I said we all know: "Again, "average" teams do nothing to move the national needle. Perception is based on the top teams. Perception translates to eyeballs on tv, which translates to $$$. Games between middling teams (in any conference) do not matter when it comes to the $$." I don't see anything in that statement that we don't all know. We all know perception is based on the teams at the top. That isn't the issue. The issue is whether those perceptions are [I]valid[/I] when it comes to conference comparisons, whether conferences should be compared based on just what's on top or all of the conferences, top to bottom. Since the top teams play the other teams, the middling ones and the bottom feeders, and base their reputations in large part based on those games, I don't see how ignoring the middle and bottom of the conferences makes for any valid comparison. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP unanimously approves 5+7 model for new 12-team playoff
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top