Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
CFP First Ranking - I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Squints" data-source="post: 94099" data-attributes="member: 822"><p>You misinterpret me. I didn't say that's how it was. I said that's how it should be. Big difference. I think I've made it pretty clear that I have no faith in committee's ability to overcome the biases we've been talking about for years now.</p><p></p><p>I do think you picked a terrible example though. Do you think FSU shouldn't be in the top four? Because that's crazy talk. I think they have one of the best cases to be there at this point. They're one of two undefeated "Power 5" teams and have beaten two other teams on that top 25. And are about to play a 3rd this week. (I think they're the only one to do that but I'm not gonna go through all the schedules to double check so I might be wrong.) If they weren't in the top four the credibility of the committee would have been shot after the first poll. And rightfully so if you ask me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you could make a very good argument for taking out Ole Miss and/or Auburn at this point. And replacing them with Oregon, Michigan State, Notre Dame, Kansas State, or TCU. But that'll work itself out. I'm not so much complaining about the selections but the potential thought process that led to those selections.</p><p></p><p>I mean somebody made a good point that the committee used SoS to differentiate the 1-loss teams. Ok fine then let's look at Michigan State who's at #8 with their only loss being to #5 Oregon. If they played at Akron instead of Oregon they'd be number three in the poll? I thought we were rewarding teams for scheduling tough OOC games. It doesn't seam that way. True, ot's only the first poll and there's plenty of football left to play so I'll cut them some slack but so far it's not encouraging at all in my eyes. Should have stuck with the computers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Squints, post: 94099, member: 822"] You misinterpret me. I didn't say that's how it was. I said that's how it should be. Big difference. I think I've made it pretty clear that I have no faith in committee's ability to overcome the biases we've been talking about for years now. I do think you picked a terrible example though. Do you think FSU shouldn't be in the top four? Because that's crazy talk. I think they have one of the best cases to be there at this point. They're one of two undefeated "Power 5" teams and have beaten two other teams on that top 25. And are about to play a 3rd this week. (I think they're the only one to do that but I'm not gonna go through all the schedules to double check so I might be wrong.) If they weren't in the top four the credibility of the committee would have been shot after the first poll. And rightfully so if you ask me. I think you could make a very good argument for taking out Ole Miss and/or Auburn at this point. And replacing them with Oregon, Michigan State, Notre Dame, Kansas State, or TCU. But that'll work itself out. I'm not so much complaining about the selections but the potential thought process that led to those selections. I mean somebody made a good point that the committee used SoS to differentiate the 1-loss teams. Ok fine then let's look at Michigan State who's at #8 with their only loss being to #5 Oregon. If they played at Akron instead of Oregon they'd be number three in the poll? I thought we were rewarding teams for scheduling tough OOC games. It doesn't seam that way. True, ot's only the first poll and there's plenty of football left to play so I'll cut them some slack but so far it's not encouraging at all in my eyes. Should have stuck with the computers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
CFP First Ranking - I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top