Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stinger78" data-source="post: 982197" data-attributes="member: 6771"><p>Dude, you've got three stories and just keep rotating between them.</p><p>1. "FSU isn't the same team w/o their star QB." This is true but means nothing, UGA isn't the same team w/o Bowers, OSU wasn't the same team w/o Daniels, etc. While it's a true statement, that's CFB. It's next man up and FSU still might be good enough to win it all. </p><p>2. "FSU looked bad in their last 3 games." So, Bama looked good? UGAg looked good? That's not a criterion. Things happen that make teams look bad all the time. It doesn't negate a season record.</p><p>3. "The committee didn't want to risk another blowout." First, they have no idea if any game is going to be a blowout or not. There might be one with these teams. Second, you're telling me that their risk matrix determined the probability that the incredible FSU D giving up a blowout is a high probability? Baloney. They yielded only 29 to LSU, the top O in the country, 20 points to Miami, the #26 O in the country, 6 points to L'ville, the #44 O in the country, 15 points to UF, the #48 O in the country, and 24 points to Clemson, the #50 O in the country. That's 5 of the top offensive 50 teams in the nation by average yards and they gave up an average of 19 points to those 5 teams. That theory is baloney. </p><p></p><p>So... Number 1. Number 2. Number 3. Save us all reading time and just give us a number, please.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stinger78, post: 982197, member: 6771"] Dude, you've got three stories and just keep rotating between them. 1. "FSU isn't the same team w/o their star QB." This is true but means nothing, UGA isn't the same team w/o Bowers, OSU wasn't the same team w/o Daniels, etc. While it's a true statement, that's CFB. It's next man up and FSU still might be good enough to win it all. 2. "FSU looked bad in their last 3 games." So, Bama looked good? UGAg looked good? That's not a criterion. Things happen that make teams look bad all the time. It doesn't negate a season record. 3. "The committee didn't want to risk another blowout." First, they have no idea if any game is going to be a blowout or not. There might be one with these teams. Second, you're telling me that their risk matrix determined the probability that the incredible FSU D giving up a blowout is a high probability? Baloney. They yielded only 29 to LSU, the top O in the country, 20 points to Miami, the #26 O in the country, 6 points to L'ville, the #44 O in the country, 15 points to UF, the #48 O in the country, and 24 points to Clemson, the #50 O in the country. That's 5 of the top offensive 50 teams in the nation by average yards and they gave up an average of 19 points to those 5 teams. That theory is baloney. So... Number 1. Number 2. Number 3. Save us all reading time and just give us a number, please. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top