Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 977950" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>They missed the boat when they first created the playoff system. The perfect system was right in their face, but they either didn’t look or were persuaded to look around it. How the playoff should've originally been created was to use the existing bowls and their tie-ins as the foundation. That gets you all 5 P5 champs in, with a G5 champ, and 2 at-large teams. Your playoff would look like this:</p><p>“Round 1”</p><p>SEC champ vs. At-large/G5 in the Sugar Bowl</p><p>ACC champ vs. At-large/G5 in the Orange Bowl</p><p>Big 12 champ vs. At-large/G5 in the Cotton Bowl</p><p>PAC 12 champ vs. B1G champ in the Rose Bowl</p><p></p><p>“Round 2”</p><p>Sugar Bowl champ vs. Orange Bowl champ in the Peach Bowl</p><p>Rose Bowl champ vs. Cotton Bowl champ in the Fiesta Bowl</p><p></p><p>Championship</p><p>Peach Bowl champ vs. Fiesta Bowl champ</p><p></p><p>This format keeps all of the NY6/BCS bowl games relevant each year, maintains strong ties for conferences to a big bowl, gets all of the legitimate contenders in the playoff, AND provides clear and unquestionable criteria for making the playoffs. If that was the format they chose for the original playoff I think all of college football would be in a healthier place today. No chance conferences would be cannibalizing each other the way they are currently IMO</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 977950, member: 4572"] They missed the boat when they first created the playoff system. The perfect system was right in their face, but they either didn’t look or were persuaded to look around it. How the playoff should've originally been created was to use the existing bowls and their tie-ins as the foundation. That gets you all 5 P5 champs in, with a G5 champ, and 2 at-large teams. Your playoff would look like this: “Round 1” SEC champ vs. At-large/G5 in the Sugar Bowl ACC champ vs. At-large/G5 in the Orange Bowl Big 12 champ vs. At-large/G5 in the Cotton Bowl PAC 12 champ vs. B1G champ in the Rose Bowl “Round 2” Sugar Bowl champ vs. Orange Bowl champ in the Peach Bowl Rose Bowl champ vs. Cotton Bowl champ in the Fiesta Bowl Championship Peach Bowl champ vs. Fiesta Bowl champ This format keeps all of the NY6/BCS bowl games relevant each year, maintains strong ties for conferences to a big bowl, gets all of the legitimate contenders in the playoff, AND provides clear and unquestionable criteria for making the playoffs. If that was the format they chose for the original playoff I think all of college football would be in a healthier place today. No chance conferences would be cannibalizing each other the way they are currently IMO [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
CFP Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top