Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
CDS staff speculation.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 943187" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>The bold is just a laughable argument. Even if it were true that they didn't come here nobody contacted them or because we didn't have assistants in place they wouldn't say it. How many players ever comment about why they didn't go to certain schools? </p><p></p><p>Yes, it's speculative, just like any number of other factors that have been talked about. It's speculative that we have a better NIL structure in place now. It's speculative that CDS's time as a pro player will be beneficial. It's speculative whether hiring CDS quickly mattered at all to begin with so of course it's speculative whether having a staff or not in place quickly would have helped. </p><p></p><p>No where did I say we couldn't have success in the portal without a staff. Hell, we could have waited two months to make a hire and still possibly found success in the portal. The quick coaching change itself was a probability thing. We were more likely to have success in the portal with a quick change than a slow one. Not that a quick change guaranteed success or a slow one guaranteed failure. A quick hire of CDS made it more likely to take advantage of the portal. A slow hire of the staff made it less likely. Yes we have two signees. We also have the same basic needs that we had a month ago with regards to big men, and we probably now also need more depth from the portal because of what we lost (which yes, may have little or nothing to do with CDS). Would having a staff in place two weeks ago have changed that? Maybe, and maybe not. It's speculative. But not having a staff didn't make it more likely. And yes, there are other factors to hiring a staff than just the immediate first 3 weeks impact on the portal. But posters here seem to detest anything that can't be summarized in a tweet. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, you and others just jump on literally any sign of negativity as if it's someone calling for program to have the death penalty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 943187, member: 2299"] The bold is just a laughable argument. Even if it were true that they didn't come here nobody contacted them or because we didn't have assistants in place they wouldn't say it. How many players ever comment about why they didn't go to certain schools? Yes, it's speculative, just like any number of other factors that have been talked about. It's speculative that we have a better NIL structure in place now. It's speculative that CDS's time as a pro player will be beneficial. It's speculative whether hiring CDS quickly mattered at all to begin with so of course it's speculative whether having a staff or not in place quickly would have helped. No where did I say we couldn't have success in the portal without a staff. Hell, we could have waited two months to make a hire and still possibly found success in the portal. The quick coaching change itself was a probability thing. We were more likely to have success in the portal with a quick change than a slow one. Not that a quick change guaranteed success or a slow one guaranteed failure. A quick hire of CDS made it more likely to take advantage of the portal. A slow hire of the staff made it less likely. Yes we have two signees. We also have the same basic needs that we had a month ago with regards to big men, and we probably now also need more depth from the portal because of what we lost (which yes, may have little or nothing to do with CDS). Would having a staff in place two weeks ago have changed that? Maybe, and maybe not. It's speculative. But not having a staff didn't make it more likely. And yes, there are other factors to hiring a staff than just the immediate first 3 weeks impact on the portal. But posters here seem to detest anything that can't be summarized in a tweet. No, you and others just jump on literally any sign of negativity as if it's someone calling for program to have the death penalty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
CDS staff speculation.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top