Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Can DC Thacker adopt Army’s “position-less defense?”
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YJMD" data-source="post: 526198" data-attributes="member: 1929"><p>Is that the philosophy we're going to try for? I know CGC has talked about press man coverage and working directly with the corners to make that work. It doesn't by any means preclude this philosophy. I do really like creating confusion especially in pre-snap reads against college offenses. Not a lot of personnel to prepare for it and even if you are able to diagnose it, you've then gotta teach it to the players who all have to be on the same page with it.</p><p></p><p>Personally I think a zone blocking scheme works better than power here. If the OL are blocking an area and the RB doesn't have a designated hole, there's not an imperative to diagnose who's coming at you. For reference, Army held AFA to 14 and Navy to 10 this year. Clearly the option isn't kryptonite to it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YJMD, post: 526198, member: 1929"] Is that the philosophy we're going to try for? I know CGC has talked about press man coverage and working directly with the corners to make that work. It doesn't by any means preclude this philosophy. I do really like creating confusion especially in pre-snap reads against college offenses. Not a lot of personnel to prepare for it and even if you are able to diagnose it, you've then gotta teach it to the players who all have to be on the same page with it. Personally I think a zone blocking scheme works better than power here. If the OL are blocking an area and the RB doesn't have a designated hole, there's not an imperative to diagnose who's coming at you. For reference, Army held AFA to 14 and Navy to 10 this year. Clearly the option isn't kryptonite to it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Can DC Thacker adopt Army’s “position-less defense?”
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top