Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Brand New Transfer Season NIL talk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RamblinRed" data-source="post: 993007" data-attributes="member: 1776"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ncaa-imposes-significant-sanctions-on-florida-state-for-nil-related-recruiting-violations/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>According to the article this was a negotiated settlement - meaning no appeal.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Two years of probation for Florida State. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A two-year show cause, a suspension from the next three regular season games, a two-week restriction on recruiting communication and a restriction from off-campus recruiting during fall 2023 for Atkins . </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A three-year disassociation from the booster. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A one-year disassociation from the collective. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A $5,000 fine plus 1% of the football budget. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A 5% reduction in football scholarships over the two-year probationary period. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A reduction in recruiting official visits in the 2023-24 academic year. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A reduction in football recruiting communications for a total of six weeks during the 2023-24 and 2024-25 academic years.</li> </ul><p></p><p>My take on this is for FSU to take a negotiated settlement then the NCAA must of had some great evidence and it could have been much worse.</p><p>My sense is that the big issue is the OC took the potential transfer kid to the booster and collective directly. That is one of the few no-nos in this process.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RamblinRed, post: 993007, member: 1776"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ncaa-imposes-significant-sanctions-on-florida-state-for-nil-related-recruiting-violations/[/URL] According to the article this was a negotiated settlement - meaning no appeal. [LIST] [*]Two years of probation for Florida State. [*]A two-year show cause, a suspension from the next three regular season games, a two-week restriction on recruiting communication and a restriction from off-campus recruiting during fall 2023 for Atkins . [*]A three-year disassociation from the booster. [*]A one-year disassociation from the collective. [*]A $5,000 fine plus 1% of the football budget. [*]A 5% reduction in football scholarships over the two-year probationary period. [*]A reduction in recruiting official visits in the 2023-24 academic year. [*]A reduction in football recruiting communications for a total of six weeks during the 2023-24 and 2024-25 academic years. [/LIST] My take on this is for FSU to take a negotiated settlement then the NCAA must of had some great evidence and it could have been much worse. My sense is that the big issue is the OC took the potential transfer kid to the booster and collective directly. That is one of the few no-nos in this process. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Brand New Transfer Season NIL talk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top