Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Bracketology - Let's Do This
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 784607" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>I agree, although I also think it has to do with the fact we are very well liked by computers in comparison to the others on the bubble watch, and I think the committee is more likely to closely look at those than pollsters (I can't really blame pollsters for not looking at it for ~100 teams trying to update it as often as they do). FWIW, it isn't just the NET. BPI, SOR, KPI, Sagrin, Pomroy. They are all pretty much in agreement about GT (we're between 30-40 for all of them). Most of the others have a lot more variance. Some examples are UL that is ranked above 30 in 3 and below 45 in the other 2. Rutgers has three in the thirties and 2 at 50. VCU has a spread of 22 to 62. MSU has a spread of 36 to 69. </p><p></p><p> I have to think that if we are even still on the bubble come tourney time we'd have a resume that stands out because of that (if that trend holds). At the very least I would think that would cause them to look closer at the two bad losses to see if there is a reason to believe they are outliers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 784607, member: 2299"] I agree, although I also think it has to do with the fact we are very well liked by computers in comparison to the others on the bubble watch, and I think the committee is more likely to closely look at those than pollsters (I can't really blame pollsters for not looking at it for ~100 teams trying to update it as often as they do). FWIW, it isn't just the NET. BPI, SOR, KPI, Sagrin, Pomroy. They are all pretty much in agreement about GT (we're between 30-40 for all of them). Most of the others have a lot more variance. Some examples are UL that is ranked above 30 in 3 and below 45 in the other 2. Rutgers has three in the thirties and 2 at 50. VCU has a spread of 22 to 62. MSU has a spread of 36 to 69. I have to think that if we are even still on the bubble come tourney time we'd have a resume that stands out because of that (if that trend holds). At the very least I would think that would cause them to look closer at the two bad losses to see if there is a reason to believe they are outliers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Bracketology - Let's Do This
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top