Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Bracketology - Let's Do This
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 2897" data-source="post: 783370"><p>Just for some more detailed fun, this article is 1 hour old from ESPN, taking into account yesterday's games.</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2021/03/01/ncaa-tournament-bracketology-new-no-1-seed-march-madness-bubble/6866571002/[/URL]</p><p>(In Parenthesis is NET Ranking)</p><p></p><p>Last 4 in:</p><p>Seton Hall (53)</p><p><strong>Georgia Tech (40)</strong></p><p>VCU (37)</p><p>Connecticut (36)</p><p></p><p>First 4 out:</p><p>Michigan State (77)</p><p>Duke (53)</p><p>St. John's (73)</p><p>SMU (55)</p><p></p><p>These don't look so bad. We seem to fit in nicely to this group appropriately. But here is where it gets funny, when you look at the at-large seeds. I'm going to highlight everyone who has a worse rating yet is in above us.</p><p></p><p>12: Seton Hall (53) / Georgia Tech (40)</p><p>12: Western Kentucky (74)</p><p>12: Toledo (58)</p><p>11: Drake (42)</p><p>11: Colorado State (43)</p><p>10: Oregon (44)</p><p>10: Xavier (48)</p><p>10: Wichita State (66)</p><p>10: Louisville (46)</p><p>9: North Carolina (41)</p><p>6: Virginia Tech (45)</p><p>6: Missouri (47)</p><p></p><p>12 teams rated worse than their supposed main metric they use are in ahead of us. And of course note that we are rated higher than 3 of the 12 seeds, 2 of the 11 seeds, all damned 4 of the 10 seeds, higher than a 9 seed, and even <u>higher than 2 of the damned 6 seeds</u>.</p><p></p><p>This **** is crazy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 2897, post: 783370"] Just for some more detailed fun, this article is 1 hour old from ESPN, taking into account yesterday's games. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2021/03/01/ncaa-tournament-bracketology-new-no-1-seed-march-madness-bubble/6866571002/[/URL] (In Parenthesis is NET Ranking) Last 4 in: Seton Hall (53) [B]Georgia Tech (40)[/B] VCU (37) Connecticut (36) First 4 out: Michigan State (77) Duke (53) St. John's (73) SMU (55) These don't look so bad. We seem to fit in nicely to this group appropriately. But here is where it gets funny, when you look at the at-large seeds. I'm going to highlight everyone who has a worse rating yet is in above us. 12: Seton Hall (53) / Georgia Tech (40) 12: Western Kentucky (74) 12: Toledo (58) 11: Drake (42) 11: Colorado State (43) 10: Oregon (44) 10: Xavier (48) 10: Wichita State (66) 10: Louisville (46) 9: North Carolina (41) 6: Virginia Tech (45) 6: Missouri (47) 12 teams rated worse than their supposed main metric they use are in ahead of us. And of course note that we are rated higher than 3 of the 12 seeds, 2 of the 11 seeds, all damned 4 of the 10 seeds, higher than a 9 seed, and even [U]higher than 2 of the damned 6 seeds[/U]. This **** is crazy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Bracketology - Let's Do This
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top