Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Bracketology - Let's Do This
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 2897" data-source="post: 781935"><p>Look at the 10 seeds:</p><p>51, Seton Hall</p><p>34, Drake</p><p>32, Boise State</p><p>30, Maryland (13-10)</p><p></p><p>Notice the NET Ratings of the Last 4 In (if that's what yellow means):</p><p>52, Indiana</p><p>50, Xavier</p><p>60, Minnesota</p><p>46, Colorado State</p><p></p><p>Look at the other 11 seeds:</p><p>35, VCU</p><p>53, Louisville</p><p></p><p>Look at the other 12 seeds:</p><p>68, Wichita State</p><p>63, Belmont</p><p>67, Toledo</p><p></p><p>Notice the NET Ratings of the First 4 Out:</p><p>57, Stanford</p><p>55, UConn</p><p>47, Duke</p><p>58, Richmond</p><p></p><p>Notice the NET Ratings of the Next 4 Out:</p><p>49, Georgia Tech</p><p>56, Utah State</p><p>59, SMU</p><p>48, Saint Louis</p><p></p><p>See anything interesting? LOL.</p><p></p><p>Our NET rating is better than 3 of the 4 Last 4 In teams.</p><p></p><p>Our NET rating is decently better than 3 of the 4 first 4 out teams.</p><p></p><p>Our NET rating is significantly better (~20 points) than the 12 seeds.</p><p></p><p>Our NET rating is better than half the 11 seeds.</p><p></p><p>Our NET rating is better than 1 of the 10 seeds.</p><p></p><p>Bottom Line - its clear to me they are looking well beyond just NET ratings. There are other criteria they're looking at. And they plan on taking only 6 ACC teams if the decision was today.</p><p></p><p>What is that criteria? I don't know. Its not Quad 1 record. VCU is 0-3 but they're an 11 seed. San Diego State is a 9 seed without a Quad 1 win. North Carolina is 1-6 in Quad 1 and they're a 9 seed. Wisconsin is 3-7 in Quad 1, but they're a 5 seed.</p><p></p><p>I have no clue how they're coming up with their seeds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 2897, post: 781935"] Look at the 10 seeds: 51, Seton Hall 34, Drake 32, Boise State 30, Maryland (13-10) Notice the NET Ratings of the Last 4 In (if that's what yellow means): 52, Indiana 50, Xavier 60, Minnesota 46, Colorado State Look at the other 11 seeds: 35, VCU 53, Louisville Look at the other 12 seeds: 68, Wichita State 63, Belmont 67, Toledo Notice the NET Ratings of the First 4 Out: 57, Stanford 55, UConn 47, Duke 58, Richmond Notice the NET Ratings of the Next 4 Out: 49, Georgia Tech 56, Utah State 59, SMU 48, Saint Louis See anything interesting? LOL. Our NET rating is better than 3 of the 4 Last 4 In teams. Our NET rating is decently better than 3 of the 4 first 4 out teams. Our NET rating is significantly better (~20 points) than the 12 seeds. Our NET rating is better than half the 11 seeds. Our NET rating is better than 1 of the 10 seeds. Bottom Line - its clear to me they are looking well beyond just NET ratings. There are other criteria they're looking at. And they plan on taking only 6 ACC teams if the decision was today. What is that criteria? I don't know. Its not Quad 1 record. VCU is 0-3 but they're an 11 seed. San Diego State is a 9 seed without a Quad 1 win. North Carolina is 1-6 in Quad 1 and they're a 9 seed. Wisconsin is 3-7 in Quad 1, but they're a 5 seed. I have no clue how they're coming up with their seeds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Bracketology - Let's Do This
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top