Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Benghazi Hearings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MWBATL" data-source="post: 197877" data-attributes="member: 944"><p>With respect, having read much (but not all) of this thread, much the same words as used above can be used to describe the defense mounted by the administration.</p><p></p><p>A lot of the disagreement revolves around whether you believe the people who were there, or the politicians who were involved. None of us know the integrity of the people involved. I have some idea however, about the integrity of this administration. Their track record about Benghazi was horrid in lying about it initially as being caused by a video, when they knew within 24 hours this was certainly not the case. Yet they still sent Susan Rice out that Sunday with those talking points, and the President himself brought this up in the UN a week later.</p><p></p><p>It may be that being near an election influenced their forthrightness. It certainly was a VERY sad way to behave towards the American people in general, and the families of those who died.</p><p></p><p>I am not certain there was any dishonesty around the decision to send or not send relief that night....that much is very murky. There is NO doubt the administration knew within 24 hours the attack was a terrorist attack...Hilary's own emails to the Egyptians as well a she down family prove that much.</p><p></p><p>So, we have clear evidence there that the administration is perfectly willing to lie to the public.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MWBATL, post: 197877, member: 944"] With respect, having read much (but not all) of this thread, much the same words as used above can be used to describe the defense mounted by the administration. A lot of the disagreement revolves around whether you believe the people who were there, or the politicians who were involved. None of us know the integrity of the people involved. I have some idea however, about the integrity of this administration. Their track record about Benghazi was horrid in lying about it initially as being caused by a video, when they knew within 24 hours this was certainly not the case. Yet they still sent Susan Rice out that Sunday with those talking points, and the President himself brought this up in the UN a week later. It may be that being near an election influenced their forthrightness. It certainly was a VERY sad way to behave towards the American people in general, and the families of those who died. I am not certain there was any dishonesty around the decision to send or not send relief that night....that much is very murky. There is NO doubt the administration knew within 24 hours the attack was a terrorist attack...Hilary's own emails to the Egyptians as well a she down family prove that much. So, we have clear evidence there that the administration is perfectly willing to lie to the public. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Benghazi Hearings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top