B10 gets $52MM each

smathis30

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
732
Closest thing the ACC has to a brand as big as Michigan, Ohio State, or Penn State is UNC. Not really suprising, especially as they were the first conference to land a TV deal before cable cutting and the like started to hurt revenue.
 
travgt01

travgt01

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
559
Location
Buckhead
smathis30 said:
Closest thing the ACC has to a brand as big as Michigan, Ohio State, or Penn State is UNC. Not really suprising, especially as they were the first conference to land a TV deal before cable cutting and the like started to hurt revenue.
Click to expand...
Eh I'd say FSU football+duke bball = an osu/mich brand.
 

smathis30

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
732
travgt01 said:
Eh I'd say FSU football+duke bball = an osu/mich brand.
Click to expand...

for athletic revenue in Penn State, Wisconsin, and both Michigan schools all have higher revenue than the ACCs primary bread earner in Florida State, who is #18. Entirety of the big 10 is top 50, and 10/14 teams would be top 4 earners in the ACC
UNC is comparable to Duke and they are at #33, which is behind #9 and 10 Illinois and Indiana. Never underestimate states with one major power 5 team.

ACCs biggest issue is being second rate for most teams. UL is outearned by U.K., SCAR outearns Clemson, Penn State likely out earns Pitt, uga earns more than GT. Florida makes more than State and also likely Miami. We split North Carolina 4 ways while the SEC splits Tennessee in two. There is no reason to think unless demographic changes come and push ACC teams to being bread earners, than they will start to compete with the other conferences. The revenue set up is less than ideal based simply off locations in schools, and fighting the Midwest model of one state one income.
 
Top