Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Ahmaud Arbery murder case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 717283" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>No armed pursuit? Were they armed? Did they pursue Arbery? Yes and Yes. Going just by definitions of words, they were armed and they were in pursuit. I don't see what is confusing to you about that.</p><p></p><p>Did McMichael exit the truck? Did he stay at the door of the truck? Did he go to the front of the truck? Did he move toward the side of the road? He did exit the truck, move toward the front of the truck, and then turn towards the side of the road. Using Google, the dictionary definition of approach is "come near or nearer to (someone or something) in distance or time". McMichael didn't stay where he was, and he didn't move away from Arbery. They only thing left, "move nearer to" does indeed match the dictionary definition of approach.</p><p></p><p>I don't see how I am the one saying it backwards since I am dissecting the definitions of the words I am using and demonstrating that it does indeed match what happened. As I said before, I am not arguing based on any politics or any principle. I am using statutes and definitions and matching the available evidence to those definitions and statutes. You keep twisting words and definitions. Were the McMichaels armed? If not, why is this even a news story. Did the McMichaels pursue Arbery? Once again, if not why is this a news story. Did McMichael move further away from or closer to Arbery? Which direction fits the definition of "approach"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 717283, member: 2426"] No armed pursuit? Were they armed? Did they pursue Arbery? Yes and Yes. Going just by definitions of words, they were armed and they were in pursuit. I don't see what is confusing to you about that. Did McMichael exit the truck? Did he stay at the door of the truck? Did he go to the front of the truck? Did he move toward the side of the road? He did exit the truck, move toward the front of the truck, and then turn towards the side of the road. Using Google, the dictionary definition of approach is "come near or nearer to (someone or something) in distance or time". McMichael didn't stay where he was, and he didn't move away from Arbery. They only thing left, "move nearer to" does indeed match the dictionary definition of approach. I don't see how I am the one saying it backwards since I am dissecting the definitions of the words I am using and demonstrating that it does indeed match what happened. As I said before, I am not arguing based on any politics or any principle. I am using statutes and definitions and matching the available evidence to those definitions and statutes. You keep twisting words and definitions. Were the McMichaels armed? If not, why is this even a news story. Did the McMichaels pursue Arbery? Once again, if not why is this a news story. Did McMichael move further away from or closer to Arbery? Which direction fits the definition of "approach"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Ahmaud Arbery murder case
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top