Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Adelson: Will Georgia Tech QB Justin Thomas have 2016 to remember?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="33jacket" data-source="post: 210701" data-attributes="member: 628"><p>for me its the guy who has the single biggest impact on his teams performance, and his performance is good enough nationally to compare to others in the discussion. Sometimes that shows in stats, sometimes not. I agree, the Heisman voters have changed how they vote. But if you really look at the last 20 years....the guy who wins...sure you might argue a couple coulda been different, but the last 20 years, the guy who wins is probably the right pick. </p><p></p><p>I would say one could argue against henry, Ingram, Bradford, ron dayne, jason white....but the rest is about right.</p><p></p><p>For me its not the best player on the best team. Which is what this has become. As proof, Ingram, Richardson, Henry....isn't it a hint when you keep losing heisman RB that the team is just as good and the next RB becomes the Heisman RB. Doesn't that suggest maybe he isn't that valuable...and its really anyone's game?</p><p></p><p>So this is why it was a tragedy the Navy Qb wasn't top 2</p><p></p><p>Its also why for me, the LSU RB deserved it more than Henry. Great production, his team loses 5-6 without him. Henry's team may lose 2 at most. </p><p></p><p>Academics is not part of it for me. Just stay eligible and out of trouble.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="33jacket, post: 210701, member: 628"] for me its the guy who has the single biggest impact on his teams performance, and his performance is good enough nationally to compare to others in the discussion. Sometimes that shows in stats, sometimes not. I agree, the Heisman voters have changed how they vote. But if you really look at the last 20 years....the guy who wins...sure you might argue a couple coulda been different, but the last 20 years, the guy who wins is probably the right pick. I would say one could argue against henry, Ingram, Bradford, ron dayne, jason white....but the rest is about right. For me its not the best player on the best team. Which is what this has become. As proof, Ingram, Richardson, Henry....isn't it a hint when you keep losing heisman RB that the team is just as good and the next RB becomes the Heisman RB. Doesn't that suggest maybe he isn't that valuable...and its really anyone's game? So this is why it was a tragedy the Navy Qb wasn't top 2 Its also why for me, the LSU RB deserved it more than Henry. Great production, his team loses 5-6 without him. Henry's team may lose 2 at most. Academics is not part of it for me. Just stay eligible and out of trouble. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Adelson: Will Georgia Tech QB Justin Thomas have 2016 to remember?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top