Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ACC New Yearly Opponent Matchups Explained
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CuseJacket" data-source="post: 885498" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>Finally got around to reading the article.</p><p></p><p>For anyone who didn't read it, the summary is this. Strickland (i.e., the ACC) provided an intellectually dishonest explanation of our three permanent ACC pairings. I previously didn't care much, but the details here are trash that smells too bad to ignore.</p><p></p><p>It would have been better to just say "you got the leftovers". That would make it easier to digest. Instead, having our Wake pairing (instead of Duke) justified as "well, you'll create a history by playing them", is nothing more than a deflection that can be used to explain away every head-scratching pairing across the league.</p><p></p><p>I agree with others. Tech's preferences were pretty much ignored. We didn't want Clemson, we got Wake because "we haven't played them much" and got Louisville because it was convenient for Louisville. Cool.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CuseJacket, post: 885498, member: 274"] Finally got around to reading the article. For anyone who didn't read it, the summary is this. Strickland (i.e., the ACC) provided an intellectually dishonest explanation of our three permanent ACC pairings. I previously didn't care much, but the details here are trash that smells too bad to ignore. It would have been better to just say "you got the leftovers". That would make it easier to digest. Instead, having our Wake pairing (instead of Duke) justified as "well, you'll create a history by playing them", is nothing more than a deflection that can be used to explain away every head-scratching pairing across the league. I agree with others. Tech's preferences were pretty much ignored. We didn't want Clemson, we got Wake because "we haven't played them much" and got Louisville because it was convenient for Louisville. Cool. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ACC New Yearly Opponent Matchups Explained
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top