Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Academic Standards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 362847" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Three years ago GT finished in the top 10. Ahead of UGA. Ahead of Clemson. Ahead of all but 7 teams. I wouldn't call that non-competitive. There are two schools that were above GT that are private and don't disclose funding. Of the other 5, the team with the lowest revenue was Oregon at $111 million. GT's revenue is $76 million. Oregon has more that 150% of GT's revenue and was the <u><em><strong>lowest</strong></em></u> revenue ranked above GT. Ohio State's revenue is $170 million. That is well more than double GT's. Those teams don't have coaches analyzing all of the high school film. Those schools don't have coaches patrolling halls at curfew before a game. Those teams have large support staffs that allow their coaches to simply coach a sport. I am not trying to make excuses for GT. I am very glad that we are competitive against such odds. If you truly believe that GT is no better than an FCS team, then why do you even support them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 362847, member: 2426"] Three years ago GT finished in the top 10. Ahead of UGA. Ahead of Clemson. Ahead of all but 7 teams. I wouldn't call that non-competitive. There are two schools that were above GT that are private and don't disclose funding. Of the other 5, the team with the lowest revenue was Oregon at $111 million. GT's revenue is $76 million. Oregon has more that 150% of GT's revenue and was the [U][I][B]lowest[/B][/I][/U] revenue ranked above GT. Ohio State's revenue is $170 million. That is well more than double GT's. Those teams don't have coaches analyzing all of the high school film. Those schools don't have coaches patrolling halls at curfew before a game. Those teams have large support staffs that allow their coaches to simply coach a sport. I am not trying to make excuses for GT. I am very glad that we are competitive against such odds. If you truly believe that GT is no better than an FCS team, then why do you even support them? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Academic Standards
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top