Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2008, 2011, and 2014 all had new starting QBs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Longestday" data-source="post: 314564" data-attributes="member: 402"><p>Mark Bradly's new column ....was his column more of a back handed complement born of frustration in trying to decided GT's fate? I thought his supporting evidence could have used more thought than GT has a new QB and so does everyone else, along with a favorable schedule.</p><p></p><p>GT has a excellent record with new starting QBs (depending on what you consider excellent).</p><p></p><p>2008 was 9 and 3</p><p>2011 was 8 and 4</p><p>2014 was 10 and 2</p><p></p><p>Now here you could mention that the possible starting QB played a full game and won against a very good defensive team... a team that normally stone walls GT's offense.</p><p></p><p>His second reason was a favorable schedule (from hell). GT's two toughest opponents only have home field advantage and a week off before the game. I think a better backing would be to state VT and UNC are homes games and they are replacing many positions. But counter the pervious statement with the first statement. </p><p></p><p>The OL is the biggest chance to continue success and that complete line was tested against a very good VT team in 2016. This is the first year where I think each individual OL player will match the sum of the whole. The risk here is depth.</p><p></p><p>Offensive skill positions are solid and more than just solid. Experienced Juniors and Seniors and some game changing Sophomores. Here would be a good time to look at Mills and Lynch's achievements in 2016.</p><p></p><p>The DB have a lot of solid proven talent. The big question mark in GT's ceiling is the LB and DL. Who will stand out or what unit will change the game? All that defensive possibility is framed with a possible offense in the top 20. Can the defense improve an FEI of 18 points to mach a 76 rank of 2014 ?</p><p></p><p>9 and 3 is more likely than 7 and 5 given GT's history and GT's current starting parameters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Longestday, post: 314564, member: 402"] Mark Bradly's new column ....was his column more of a back handed complement born of frustration in trying to decided GT's fate? I thought his supporting evidence could have used more thought than GT has a new QB and so does everyone else, along with a favorable schedule. GT has a excellent record with new starting QBs (depending on what you consider excellent). 2008 was 9 and 3 2011 was 8 and 4 2014 was 10 and 2 Now here you could mention that the possible starting QB played a full game and won against a very good defensive team... a team that normally stone walls GT's offense. His second reason was a favorable schedule (from hell). GT's two toughest opponents only have home field advantage and a week off before the game. I think a better backing would be to state VT and UNC are homes games and they are replacing many positions. But counter the pervious statement with the first statement. The OL is the biggest chance to continue success and that complete line was tested against a very good VT team in 2016. This is the first year where I think each individual OL player will match the sum of the whole. The risk here is depth. Offensive skill positions are solid and more than just solid. Experienced Juniors and Seniors and some game changing Sophomores. Here would be a good time to look at Mills and Lynch's achievements in 2016. The DB have a lot of solid proven talent. The big question mark in GT's ceiling is the LB and DL. Who will stand out or what unit will change the game? All that defensive possibility is framed with a possible offense in the top 20. Can the defense improve an FEI of 18 points to mach a 76 rank of 2014 ? 9 and 3 is more likely than 7 and 5 given GT's history and GT's current starting parameters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2008, 2011, and 2014 all had new starting QBs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top