Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
114 Years of GT Football – How will history repeat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gtwcf" data-source="post: 439646" data-attributes="member: 452"><p>Interesting analysis. </p><p></p><p>I wonder how much of the spending analysis takes into account that we don't have an OC now. Although I'll admit we had a similar situation with Gailey, but we had titled OCs even when he was calling plays.</p><p></p><p>I'm guessing the big difference is the back office operations, which can offload requirements from the field staff to allow them to concentrate on gameplanning and key recruiting targets. I don't know that facilities really make that much of an incremental difference part a certain point, or Miami would have fallen off the map. </p><p></p><p>I think it does show that the ACC was weak during the Gailey years. I think we've gotten more of the young HC talent in the ACC recently due to realistic expectations within the conference and no Saban. We may lag behind slightly at the position coaches, but I think that's slightly lower on the trajectory for program levers for success.</p><p></p><p>I'm going to be interested to see our new D this year. I'm also looking forward to not giving up 3-7 points at the end of each half....I think this could be 1-2 wins per year if we figure out 2 minute defense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gtwcf, post: 439646, member: 452"] Interesting analysis. I wonder how much of the spending analysis takes into account that we don't have an OC now. Although I'll admit we had a similar situation with Gailey, but we had titled OCs even when he was calling plays. I'm guessing the big difference is the back office operations, which can offload requirements from the field staff to allow them to concentrate on gameplanning and key recruiting targets. I don't know that facilities really make that much of an incremental difference part a certain point, or Miami would have fallen off the map. I think it does show that the ACC was weak during the Gailey years. I think we've gotten more of the young HC talent in the ACC recently due to realistic expectations within the conference and no Saban. We may lag behind slightly at the position coaches, but I think that's slightly lower on the trajectory for program levers for success. I'm going to be interested to see our new D this year. I'm also looking forward to not giving up 3-7 points at the end of each half....I think this could be 1-2 wins per year if we figure out 2 minute defense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
114 Years of GT Football – How will history repeat?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top