I wouldn't read too much into this interview. I would be more concerned if they acted like they didn't care. I would be pi$$ed to if I was on a team thats been losing the way we have.
IMO this has to do with the idea / technique of 'tackling the ball' to force turnovers.
Tacking high is always a bad idea.
First, it doesn't stop the ball carrier
Second, it doesn't generate a fumble
Third, it's a huge boost to the runner's confidence to take a big hit and keep gaining yards.
IDK...one play was a throw out to the flats, the defender was there ready to make the tackle. He threw it at the receivers feet. If completed would have resulted in a two to three yard loss. IMO this was a heads up play.
The other times I can't exactly remember.
At times it seems Sims is...
Yes. Bravo. Some of us saw it when he got off the bus but the we are all in the same place now. Now what? Well, we are just by ourselves looking around as a wise man used to say.
On every post I made being critical of this staff...You said you can't have an opinion o=because you dont have stats to back it up...well..here we are sitting on three wins yet again...so where are your stats?
1). Ehh probably zero
2) D
3) Hmmm. 4? IDK
4) D
5) from here on out. Minus 5 yards for ending in a preposition
6). IDK. how many teams are there?
7) probably Duke
BTW. show me the f-ing stats to back up this sarcastic thread LOL.
Where are your stats to make any of these statements? Isn't that what you said? You have to have stats to back up your opinion?
where are your numbers?
How bout this: 17 Points against VT
The lack of 3rd down conversions to me show how our O just disappears at the worst possible times. This may contribute to both PITT piling on the scores and UVa making a comeback.
Without two GREAT onside kick recoveries we are looking at twenty-seven points against UVa
I don't see us being...
My initial post in this thread wasn't against something you said so who is the troll?
Patenaude has not and will not be able to bring us wins. We have talent on the field just not in the press box.
Didn't you say this: Again, you are projecting your own opinions as the correct ones. You don't...
Over 100 three and outs and scoring more than 28 points only six times. FACT
He isn't up to the task.
At this point he should be sustaining drives, (0-4 in the second and third quarters for third down conversions) versus UVa
Versus Pitt the back to back INTS were bad but then following it up...
First sentence: From what I can tell Dave's scheme can put up stats but can't score.
Either you think Dave can get the job done or you don't. I don't and there isn't enough evidence there to change my mind.
One point on a graph doesn't make a trend. 82% of our trips to the red zone. Yes. 9-29 and over one-hundred three and outs while at Tech says he is a problem. How many games has he scored more than twenty-eight? (This is for you Cuse :) )
He still has a problem scoring points.
From what I can tell Dave's scheme can put up stats but can't score. His red zone production is awful. You could make the case this is due to the O-Line but he is a pass first disciple. His highlights at CC show lots of passing TDs in the red zone but not many rushing. I think his coaching...
Why wouldn't CGC just wait a few years and get a huge payday then get a demotion to UF's DC?
If he was worried about Tech financials and his career, I would think he would restructure his contract in order to attract / pay new coordinators.
OUCH.
Well, we only scored 27 until ~2:30 in the 4th. The offense looked better but still didn't score.
UVa's D was ranked in the 90s. We still have a problem on offense.
The onside kicks, that was a fun surprise.
Not sure what the strategy is on punt returns. Each time we field the punt...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.