Search results

Do you still remember his name?

Good for you. When I think of all the things people call you, I think it's great that you politely summarize them as "crazy"

If they don't pass your Sunday School class, do you tell them to go to u[sic]ga?

Very unfortunate typo.

If you look at our OL on that play, it's pretty obvious why it can't be an rpo. Most of our run plays ask certain OL to get to the next level. They would be illegal downfield on a passing play.

I think we're going to end up primarily using two different types of OLB, one more of a pass-rusher like Vic and the other a hybrid safety / coverage guy. I think we got guys to play at both.

You'll still have georgie to root against ... (Jesus likes the blue jerseys)

That was clearly a voice to text post ... ... a few beers in (y)

If only 45 yr olds had some meaningful relationship with 17 yr olds ... ... ... ... Oh, wait a second ...

They make good Mother's Day gifts

It's not that big a deal to me. When you use pronouns like WE and OUR, you rhetorically assume that everyone or every reasonable person shares your point of view. As I said before, I think reasonable people can say that we know enough from Spring to have SOME idea about who will play nose...

LOL I know how to respond when confronted with this depth of conviction: "Yes, dear."

It's season ticket time

???? This was your earlier post (emphasis added):

I'll be happy if he avoids hitting other drivers or pedestrians.

No worries. Like I said, I disagree with you saying that WE have no idea and OUR question marks. I think some of us can reasonably have some idea.

They played NT in the Spring under Woody. There were spring practice reports.

I disagree with this use of "no idea." We know Kyle Cerge Henderson and Chris Martin as well as Glanton etc played nose. We have some idea.

Not true. We know about personnel. We know Woody's D has been statistically strong the last 3 years. We have SOME IDEA.

uVA will still look like a poor man's Auburn.