There is also the natural attrition of leaving early for the NFL. We don’t have to worry about that but Bama, Clemson and UGA do. This might account for some of those high numbers in recruiting classes, but not all of it.
Wow so many intriguing nuggets of insight in that interview I don’t know where to begin. Just jesting fellas. ;)Well, he answered the questions he was asked.
I think it’s mostly a point of pride. They can tell everybody the reason they didn’t play for the mighty tide was because they were hurt and look, the school and coaches agree with me.
But remember, the NCAA picks and chooses who they decide to hammer. This is really not a rule issue, it’s an enforcement issue. They basically decided not to enforce their own rule.
Every team has a handful of guys who were recruiting busts. They will likely never see the field or very little...
It's all a bunch of talk with no real info coming out. There's nothing less informative than a player interview. I've listened to all of them. The coaches all have the coach speak down pat with nothing but buzz words and catch phrases. "Above the line... blah, blah, blah." "Controlled...
Between those two, it just may depend on the OL. If they got the pass blocking down, we’ likely see Lucas as he is the better passer, imo. However, if they can’t protect, I bet we see more Tobias.
The main reason for that is the lack of info coming out so there's nothing new to talk about. For all the talk about open practices to the media and such, we're getting less info on player development than last year. But I guess we can dissect the GoT graphic, oohboy?
Not exactly. I have no idea what your reference tries to say. Mine says that it is very possible to have a very good defense paired with a CPJ offense if you have the players.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.