Search results

You and me both... :(

LOL... If message boards were limited to only people who knew what they were talking about there wouldn't be any point in having a message board. :)

The infrastructure already exists with the compliance office... Worst case scenario is 1 additional employee...

Here's an idea... If they get compensation to play the game, then they should be required to pay for their college education. If they voluntarily choose to forgo compensation, then they will get a scholarship which will cover the cost of their education...

LOL - depends on how many sprints it will add to the overall timeline... :)

I agree... The overall perception of Clemson has changed... At the same time, whenever we are comparing coaches and talking about their records, we look at their overall record (at least in serious discussions and not narrative driven ones) and don't say "Well I'm going exclude that year...

You are correct, we can't see how the team is progressing. They may be getting leaps and bounds better, and we just don' t know it. The harsh reality, though, is that 2 or 5 or 20 years from now no one is going to look back and say "Well they made great strides". They will look back and say...

Not sure I would go that far... Maybe just the wire frame phase. :)

Ah, I understand... Booster says, "Come play for u(sic)ga and I will buy an autographed picture from you for $1,000,000.00" and it will be all above board...

The problem is not just paying football players... With Title IX, as soon as you pay the FB players, you have to pay EVERYONE... It will really hit the non-revenue sports hard as many of them will get dropped entirely to save money...

Everyone, no one will ever settle this debate because there are (at least) two different definitions being used for the word processing from what I can tell... Def'n 1: When a coach tells a player that he probably never going to see the field and might consider looking elsewhere if he wants to...

In reality, people should be glad that there are fans who are passionate enough about GT to complain about a bad start. It's when those people quit caring enough to complain that it will be time to worry... Apathy would be (hopefully would be and not will be!) a FAR worse problem for the...

That would ALMOST be a reason to hope to lose out... :)

I don't think this is a narrative issue. Their good work is simply getting swamped by the overall abysmal play from the team. Pretty much everyone agrees that there is a noticeable improvement from the defense - Citadel game aside...

Glad you are back BTW...

I'm sure GTBob will get the game posted before too long. It begs the question, though, "Why would you want to?" :)

I have to disagree for one reason. If CPJ were still here, then CGC would still be coaching at Temple and he has already proven that he has no clue how to defend the triple option. I think we would have won in a shootout...

I suppose I can see the point, but a philosophy of lose now to maybe win later is not rational. A guaranteed loss traded for the possibility of a win is a long term losing strategy...

I guess this is what confuses me. Surely our coaches could see the issues we were going to have with the OL esp.with pass blocking. Where is the transition plan? Where was the plan to play to the strengths of our OL, which has to be drive blocking since that is what they were recruited for and...

Well CGC said he planned on “turning around” the program. 4 games in and he has definitely done that